Politically correct and gender-neutral language: effects, consequences, acceptance
ACNS Conference Series: Social Sciences and Humanities, Volume 3 (2023): 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Linguistics, Literature and Language Education (3L-Edu 2022) 18 May 2022, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, Article 01002
Political correctness and gender-neutral language are language practices that aim to critically examine current language usage based on certain progressive norms and reject certain words, terms, or expressions deemed inappropriate, while seeking alternatives. This applies to all forms of expression that could offend, discriminate, or underrepresent someone based on their ethnic origin, gender, social class, physical or mental disability, or sexual orientation. Advocates of this language usage argue that it helps promote greater inclusivity, respect, and equality in society, while opponents argue that it leads to language regulation that can make language unclear, complicated, contradictory, incomprehensible, or even censorious. Moreover, some critics argue that this language regulation can be counterproductive, as it may unintentionally draw attention to and reinforce differences among people, rather than celebrating diversity. Additionally, some have argued that language regulation can distract from more significant issues of systemic oppression and inequality, leading to a superficial focus on language instead of real social change. In summary, the debate over politically correct and gender-neutral language reflects broader debates over cultural and social change, with proponents seeing it as a necessary step toward greater equality and respect, and opponents viewing it as a restriction on free speech and a form of social engineering.
political correctness, gender-neutral language, progressive norms, language regulation, inclusivity, respect, equality, oppression, systemic inequality, free speech, social engineering
Article PDF
@article{10.55056/cs-ssh/3/01002,
doi = {10.55056/cs-ssh/3/01002},
url = {https://doi.org/10.55056/cs-ssh/3/01002},
year = {2023},
publisher = {{Academy of Cognitive and Natural Sciences}},
volume = {3},
pages = {01002},
author = {Jan Čapek},
title = {{Politically correct and gender-neutral language: effects, consequences, acceptance}},
journal = {{ACNS Conference Series: Social Sciences and Humanities}},
abstract = {Political correctness and gender-neutral language are language practices that aim to critically examine current language usage based on certain progressive norms and reject certain words, terms, or expressions deemed inappropriate, while seeking alternatives. This applies to all forms of expression that could offend, discriminate, or underrepresent someone based on their ethnic origin, gender, social class, physical or mental disability, or sexual orientation. Advocates of this language usage argue that it helps promote greater inclusivity, respect, and equality in society, while opponents argue that it leads to language regulation that can make language unclear, complicated, contradictory, incomprehensible, or even censorious. Moreover, some critics argue that this language regulation can be counterproductive, as it may unintentionally draw attention to and reinforce differences among people, rather than celebrating diversity. Additionally, some have argued that language regulation can distract from more significant issues of systemic oppression and inequality, leading to a superficial focus on language instead of real social change. In summary, the debate over politically correct and gender-neutral language reflects broader debates over cultural and social change, with proponents seeing it as a necessary step toward greater equality and respect, and opponents viewing it as a restriction on free speech and a form of social engineering.
},
keywords = {political correctness, gender-neutral language, progressive norms, language regulation, inclusivity, respect, equality, oppression, systemic inequality, free speech, social engineering}
}
TY - JOUR ID - 10.55056/cs-ssh/3/01002 DO - 10.55056/cs-ssh/3/01002 UR - https://doi.org/10.55056/cs-ssh/3/01002 TI - Politically correct and gender-neutral language: effects, consequences, acceptance T2 - ACNS Conference Series: Social Sciences and Humanities AU - Čapek, Jan PY - 2023 PB - Academy of Cognitive and Natural Sciences SP - 01002 VL - 3 AB - Political correctness and gender-neutral language are language practices that aim to critically examine current language usage based on certain progressive norms and reject certain words, terms, or expressions deemed inappropriate, while seeking alternatives. This applies to all forms of expression that could offend, discriminate, or underrepresent someone based on their ethnic origin, gender, social class, physical or mental disability, or sexual orientation. Advocates of this language usage argue that it helps promote greater inclusivity, respect, and equality in society, while opponents argue that it leads to language regulation that can make language unclear, complicated, contradictory, incomprehensible, or even censorious. Moreover, some critics argue that this language regulation can be counterproductive, as it may unintentionally draw attention to and reinforce differences among people, rather than celebrating diversity. Additionally, some have argued that language regulation can distract from more significant issues of systemic oppression and inequality, leading to a superficial focus on language instead of real social change. In summary, the debate over politically correct and gender-neutral language reflects broader debates over cultural and social change, with proponents seeing it as a necessary step toward greater equality and respect, and opponents viewing it as a restriction on free speech and a form of social engineering. KW - political correctness KW - gender-neutral language KW - progressive norms KW - language regulation KW - inclusivity KW - respect KW - equality KW - oppression KW - systemic inequality KW - free speech KW - social engineering ER -
%0 Journal Article %F 10.55056/cs-ssh/3/01002 %R 10.55056/cs-ssh/3/01002 %U https://doi.org/10.55056/cs-ssh/3/01002 %T Politically correct and gender-neutral language: effects, consequences, acceptance %J ACNS Conference Series: Social Sciences and Humanities %A Čapek, Jan %D 2023 %I Academy of Cognitive and Natural Sciences %P 01002 %V 3 %X Political correctness and gender-neutral language are language practices that aim to critically examine current language usage based on certain progressive norms and reject certain words, terms, or expressions deemed inappropriate, while seeking alternatives. This applies to all forms of expression that could offend, discriminate, or underrepresent someone based on their ethnic origin, gender, social class, physical or mental disability, or sexual orientation. Advocates of this language usage argue that it helps promote greater inclusivity, respect, and equality in society, while opponents argue that it leads to language regulation that can make language unclear, complicated, contradictory, incomprehensible, or even censorious. Moreover, some critics argue that this language regulation can be counterproductive, as it may unintentionally draw attention to and reinforce differences among people, rather than celebrating diversity. Additionally, some have argued that language regulation can distract from more significant issues of systemic oppression and inequality, leading to a superficial focus on language instead of real social change. In summary, the debate over politically correct and gender-neutral language reflects broader debates over cultural and social change, with proponents seeing it as a necessary step toward greater equality and respect, and opponents viewing it as a restriction on free speech and a form of social engineering. %K political correctness, gender-neutral language, progressive norms, language regulation, inclusivity, respect, equality, oppression, systemic inequality, free speech, social engineering
© Copyright for this paper by its authors, published by Academy of Cognitive and Natural Sciences (ACNS), 2023.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.