Assessing lateral thinking: validity, reliability, and universality using a novel verbal test

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55056/cte.694

Keywords:

creative thinking, lateral thinking, cognitive assessment, creativity, verbal test, universality, personality traits

Abstract

Lateral thinking, a key component of creative thinking, is crucial in problem-solving, scientific discovery, and everyday life. However, its assessment remains challenging due to its elusive nature. This study proposes and validates a novel verbal test to objectively measure lateral thinking. The test, consisting of triads of words with subtle associations, requires subjects to find commonalities between seemingly unrelated concepts. The study involves three groups: two student groups and one engineering group. Statistical analysis reveals that the test demonstrates validity, reliability, and representativeness. Notably, the probability distribution of the measured parameter shows low deviations from the normal law, suggesting that lateral thinking, like general intelligence, is a relatively universal personality trait. This work contributes to a deeper understanding of lateral thinking and provides a validated tool for its assessment, promoting creativity in education and various other fields.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract views: 315 / PDF views: 88

References

Albert Einstein, 2016. In: S. Ratcliffe, ed. Oxford essential quotations. 4th ed. Oxford University Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780191826719.013.q-oro-ed4-00003988.

Cahan, D., 2018. Helmholtz: A Life in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Chen, Y., Spagna, A., Wu, T., Kim, T.H., Wu, Q., Chen, C., Wu, Y. and Fan, J., 2019. Testing a Cognitive Control Model of Human Intelligence. Scientific Reports, 9(1), p.2898. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39685-2.

De Bono, E., 2015. Lateral thinking: creativity step by step. New York: Harper Colophon.

Dickens, W.T. and Flynn, J.R., 2001. Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: the IQ paradox resolved psychological review. Psychological review, 108(2), pp.346–369. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.346.

Eysenck, S.B.G., Eysenck, H.J. and Barrett, P., 1985. A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), pp.21–29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1.

Frenkel, V.Y., 1996. Yakov Ilich Frenkel: His work, life and letters. Birkhäuser Basel.

Hawking, S., 2018. Brief Answers to the Big Questions. New York: Bantam.

Jesson, J., 2012. Developing Creativity in the Primary School. Berkshire: Open University Press.

Juškevič, A.P. and Kopelevič, J.K., 1994. Christian Goldbach 1690–1764, Vita Mathematic, vol. 8. Birkhäuser Basel. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7382-6.

Katsko, O.O. and Moiseienko, N.V., 2018. Development computer games on the Unity game engine for research of elements of the cognitive thinking in the playing process. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2292, pp.151–155.

Kaufman, A.S., 2009. IQ Testing 101. New York: Springer Publishing.

Kukharchuk, R.P., Vakaliuk, T.A., Zaika, O.V., Riabko, A.V. and Medvediev, M.G., 2023. Implementation of STEM learning technology in the process of calibrating an NTC thermistor and developing an electronic thermometer based on it. CTE Workshop Proceedings, 10, p.251–264. Available from: https://doi.org/10.55056/cte.560.

Mellenbergh, G.J., 1989. Item bias and item response theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(2), pp.127–143. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90002-5.

Mintii, M.M., 2023. Exploring the landscape of STEM education and personnel training: a comprehensive systematic review. Educational Dimension, 9, p.149–172. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31812/ed.583.

Mozhaleva, N.G., 2015. Musical abilities, their nature and development during the instrumental music performance teacher training. Educational dimension, 44, pp.98–104. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.v44i0.2658.

Patel, J.K. and Read, C.B., 1996. Handbook of the Normal Distribution, STATISTICS: textbooks and monographs, vol. 150. 2nd ed. New York, Basel, Hong Kong: Marcel Dekker.

Shapovalov, Y.B., Bilyk, Z.I., Usenko, S.A., Shapovalov, V.B., Postova, K.H., Zhadan, S.O. and Antonenko, P.D., 2023. Harnessing personal smart tools for enhanced STEM education: exploring IoT integration. Educational Technology Quarterly, 2023(2), p.210–232. Available from: https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.604.

Stough, C., Kerkin, B., Bates, T. and Mangan, G., 1994. Music and spatial IQ. Personality and Individual Differences, 17(5), p.695. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90145-7.

Vlasenko, K., Achkan, V., Chumak, O., Lovianova, I. and Armash, T., 2020. Problem-based approach to develop creative thinking in students majoring in mathematics at teacher training universities. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), pp.2853–2863. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080712.

Wertheimer, M., 2020. Productive Thinking (1945). In: V. Sarris, ed. Max Wertheimer Productive Thinking. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.25–257. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36063-4_2.

Yakov Evseevich Geguzin: to the 100th anniversary of his birth, 2018. Kharkiv: Folio.

Young, I., 2008. Mental Models: Aligning Design Strategy with Human Behavior. New York: Rosenfeld Media.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-20

Issue

Section

Digital Transformation of Education

How to Cite

Kiv, A.E., Kolesnykova, K.V., Koycheva, T.I., Vinkovska, A.O. and Donchev, I.I., 2024. Assessing lateral thinking: validity, reliability, and universality using a novel verbal test. CTE Workshop Proceedings [Online], 11, pp.228–238. Available from: https://doi.org/10.55056/cte.694 [Accessed 15 October 2024].
Received 2024-01-07
Accepted 2024-01-27
Published 2024-03-20

Similar Articles

1-10 of 95

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>