Educational Dimension journal editorial activity report (2023)

Submission statistics

From January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023, the Educational Dimension journal received 32 new submissions (15 were under review before January 1, 2023). 27 submissions were accepted for publication, reflecting a 58% acceptance rate. Additionally, 9 submissions were declined, with a breakdown of 4 desk rejections and 5 rejections after the review process.

Timeliness of editorial decisions

The efficiency of the editorial process is crucial for maintaining the journal's quality and relevance. The average time taken for the first editorial decision was 25 days, highlighting a prompt response to submissions. The days to acceptance and rejection were 119 and 130, respectively, indicating a thorough review process.

Rejection rates

The rejection rates provide insights into the rigour of the review process. The overall rejection rate was 42%, with a desk reject rate of 15% and an after-review reject rate of 27%. These figures suggest a balanced approach to maintaining the quality of accepted publications.

Acceptance rate: 58%
Rejection rate: 42%
Desk reject rate: 15%
After review reject rate: 27%

Conclusion

The Educational Dimension journal's editorial activity in 2023 has been marked by efficiency and effectiveness. The acceptance rate of 58% suggests a discerning editorial process that upholds the journal's standards. The timeline for editorial decisions, from initial submission to acceptance or rejection, indicates a commitment to prompt and thorough review.

The detailed breakdown of rejection rates provides transparency about the reasons for declination, with 15% of submissions being rejected by the desk. This balance between a relatively high acceptance rate and a careful review process contributes to the journal's credibility and the quality of published content.

The Educational Dimension journal's editorial team has demonstrated commendable performance in managing the influx of submissions, maintaining a balance between acceptance and rejection rates, and ensuring a timely and robust review process. These factors collectively contribute to the journal's standing as a reputable source for scholarly educational contributions.