Exploring usability principles for educational online courses: a case study on an open platform for online education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.602

Keywords:

criteria of usability design, online education, online course, implementing the usability principles, educational internet resources, usability design criteria, Higher School Mathematics Teacher, teachers' perspective, students' perspective, learning environment

Abstract

This article delves into the crucial issue of effectively implementing usability principles in educational internet resources. By engaging with the latest research in the field, we investigate the influential factors shaping the outcomes of online education. Through a comprehensive analysis, we identify and examine six well-established criteria of usability design: Information Quality, System Navigation, System Learnability, Visual Design, Instructional Assessment, and System Interactivity. Additionally, we propose the existence of a seventh criterion termed Responsiveness.
To shed light on the practical application of usability principles, we focus on the open platform "Higher School Mathematics Teacher" as a case study. Through a survey administered to 203 respondents, comprising both teachers and students, we sought to gather their valuable perspectives as the initial users of the platform. The insights gained from this study provide guidance for the implementation of usability criteria on the platform, particularly during the development of online courses.
The findings strongly suggest that all seven subcategories of usability are pivotal in the design of online courses on the platform. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on usability implementation in educational technology, offering valuable insights for developers, educators, and researchers alike. By recognizing the significance of these criteria, educational internet resources can be enhanced to create more engaging, accessible, and effective learning environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract views: 955 / PDF views: 711

References

Aery, S., 2007. Breadcrumb navigation deployment in retail web sites. Master thesis. School of Information and Library Science of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. Available from: https://ils.unc.edu/MSpapers/3305.pdf.

Alshehri, A., Rutter, M. and Smith, S., 2019. Assessing the relative importance of an E-learning system’s usability design characteristics based on students preferences. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), p.839–855. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.839

Antonelli, H.L., da Silva, E.A.N. and Fortes, R.P.M., 2015. A model-driven development for creating accessible web menus. Procedia Computer Science, 67, pp.95–104. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.253

Asarbakhsh, M. and Sandars, J., 2013. E-learning: the essential usability perspective. Clinical Teacher, 10(1), p.47–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00627.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00627.x

Benson, L., Elliott, D., Grant, M., Holschuh, D., Kim, B., Kim, H., Lauber, E., Loh, S. and Reeves, T.C., 2002. Usability and Instructional Design Heuristics for E-Learning Evaluation. In: P. Barker and S. Rebelsky, eds. Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2002. Denver, Colorado, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), pp.1615–1621. Available from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/10234.

Coursera, 2023. Available from: https://www.coursera.org/.

Distance Learning Courses and Adult Education - The Open University, 2023. Available from: http://www.open.ac.uk/.

Dringus, L.P. and Cohen, M.S., 2005. An adaptable usability heuristic checklist for online courses. Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference. pp.T2H–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2005.1611918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2005.1611918

edX, 2023. Available from: https://www.edx.org/.

Enge, E., 2021. Mobile vs. Desktop usage in 2020. Available from: https://www.perficient.com/insights/research-hub/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-study.

Fang, X. and Holsapple, C.W., 2007. An empirical study of web site navigation structures’ impacts on web site usability. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), pp.476–491. Emerging Issues in Collaborative Commerce. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.004

Google Analytics, 2023. Available from: https://analytics.google.com/.

Hasan, L., 2014. Evaluating the usability of educational websites based on students’ preferences of design characteristics. International Arab Journal of e-Technology, 3(3), p.179–193. Available from: http://www.iajet.org/documents/vol.3/no.%203%20watermark/7-58496.pdf.

Higher School Mathematics Teacher, 2023. Available from: http://formathematics.com.

Hodakov, V.E. and Boskin, O.O., 2017. Interface as an integral component of the computer system. Problems of information technologies, 22, p.128–133.

Kurtcu, F., 2012. An analyze of high school web interface designs in terms of graphic design. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, pp.5661–5665. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.492

Lin, Y.C., Yeh, C.H. and Wei, C.C., 2013. How will the use of graphics affect visual aesthetics? A user-centered approach for web page design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(3), pp.217–227. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.10.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.10.013

Mansor, A.Z., 2012. Managing student grades and attendance records using google forms and google spreadsheets. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, pp.420–428. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.296

National Open University “Intuit”, 2019. Available from: https://intuit.ru/.

Nielsen, J., 1993. Usability Engineering. NY, USA: Academic Press Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-052029-2.50009-7

Nielsen, J. and Loranger, H., 2006. Prioritizing Web Usability. New Riders Pub. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234805348_Prioritizing_Web_Usability.

Panchenko, L.F., Vakaliuk, T.A. and Vlasenko, K.V., 2020. Augmented reality books: concepts, typology, tools. In: O.Y. Burov and A.E. Kiv, eds. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, May 13, 2020. CEUR-WS.org, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2731, pp.283–296. Available from: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2731/paper16.pdf.

Prometheus, 2023. Available from: https://prometheus.org.ua/.

Shahzada, F., 2017. Modern and responsive mobile-enabled web applications. Procedia Computer Science, 110, pp.410–415. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.06.105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.06.105

Squires, D. and Preece, J., 1999. Predicting quality in educational software: Evaluating for learning, usability and the synergy between them. Interacting with Computers, 11(5), pp.467–483. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00063-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00063-0

Srivastava, S.C., Chandra, S. and Lam, H.M., 2009. Usability evaluation of E-learning systems. In: M. Khosrow-Pour, ed. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology. 2nd ed. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, p.3897–3993. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-026-4.ch621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-026-4.ch621

Studio of online education Educational Era, 2023. Available from: https://www.ed-era.com/.

Sánchez-Franco, M.J., F. Villarejo-Ramos Ángel, Peral-Peral, B., Buitrago-Esquinas, E.M. and Roldán, J.L., 2013. Users’ Perception of Visual Design and the Usefulness of A Web-based Educational Tool. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, pp.1916–1921. 3rd World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.140

Vlasenko, K., Chumak, O., Achkan, V., Lovianova, I. and Kondratyeva, O., 2020. Personal e-learning environment of a mathematics teacher. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), pp.3527–3535. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080828

Vlasenko, K., Kovalenko, D., Chumak, O., Lovianova, I. and Volkov, S., 2020. Minimalism in Designing User Interface of the Online Platform “Higher School Mathematics Teacher”. In: O. Sokolov, G. Zholtkevych, V. Yakovyna, Y. Tarasich, V. Kharchenko, V. Kobets, O. Burov, S. Semerikov and H. Kravtsov, eds. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications. Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer. Volume II: Workshops, Kharkiv, Ukraine, October 06-10, 2020. CEUR-WS.org, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2732, pp.1044–1057. Available from: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2732/20201044.pdf.

Vlasenko, K., Lovianova, I., Sitak, I., Chumak, O. and Kondratyeva, O., 2019. Training of Mathematical Disciplines Teachers for Higher Educational Institutions as a Contemporary Problem. Universal journal of educational research, 7(9), p.1892–1900. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070907

Vlasenko, K.V., Volkov, S.V., Kovalenko, D.A., Sitak, I.V., Chumak, O.O. and Kostikov, A.A., 2020. Web-based online course training higher school mathematics teachers. CTE Workshop Proceedings, 7, p.648–661. Available from: https://doi.org/10.55056/cte.420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55056/cte.420

Vlasenko, K.V., Volkov, S.V., Lovianova, I.V., Sitak, I.V., Chumak, O.O., Semerikov, S.O. and Bohdanova, N.H., 2022. The Criteria of Usability Design for Educational Online Courses. In: S. Semerikov, V. Osadchyi and O. Kuzminska, eds. Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Advances in Educational Technology - Volume 1: AET. INSTICC, SciTePress, pp.461–470. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5220/0010925200003364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5220/0010925200003364

Downloads

Published

21-06-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Vlasenko, K.V., Volkov, S.V., Lovianova, I.V., Sitak, I.V., Chumak, O.O. and Bohdanova, N.H., 2023. Exploring usability principles for educational online courses: a case study on an open platform for online education. Educational Technology Quarterly [Online], 2023(2), pp.173–187. Available from: https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.602 [Accessed 12 June 2025].
Received 2022-08-17
Accepted 2023-06-01
Published 2023-06-21