Pedagogical approach of grade 7 teachers in teaching the learning competency of integers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.652Keywords:
integers, teaching strategies, learning competency, manipulativesAbstract
This research addresses the intricate challenges of teaching integers in middle school mathematics. Focusing on grade 7 teachers, the study explores strategies to enhance integers' teaching-learning competency, revealing nuanced approaches employed by three teachers. Through qualitative methods, specifically in-depth interviews, the research uses an exploratory approach to unravel the underlying strategies shaping the teaching of integers. Key findings underscore integers as a formidable learning competency for grade 7 students, particularly in operations like addition and subtraction. The most effective pedagogical approach, encapsulated in the 3Rs — Reaching, Representing, Recommending — involves drill exercises for foundational concepts, integrating manipulatives like algebra tiles and coloured tiles, and advocating for continuous manipulative use with persistent drill exercises and integrating technology. These identified themes emphasize the need for a uniform understanding among teachers during discussions to ensure a cohesive and effective teaching strategy. Recognizing these strategies is crucial for addressing the existing learning gap and advancing grade 7 students' competency in dealing with integers. The research contributes valuable insights to the academic discourse, offering effective pedagogical practices and fostering a more robust foundation for mathematical understanding at the middle school level.
Downloads
References
Akyüz, D., Stephan, M. and Dixon, J., 2012. The role of the teacher in supporting imagery in understanding integers [tamsayıların anlaşılmasında Öğretmenin İmgelemeyi desteklemedeki rolü]. Eğitim ve Bilim – Education and Science, 37(163), pp.268–282. Available from: http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/1277.
Almeida, R. and Bruno, A., 2014. Strategies of pre-service primary school teachers for solving addition problems with negative numbers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(5), pp.719–737. Available from: https://doi.org/10. 1080/0020739X.2013.877605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.877605
Arifin, F. and Herman, T., 2018. Pengaruh pembelajaran e-learning model web centric course terhadap pemahaman konsep dan kemandirian belajar matematika siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), pp.1–12. Available from: https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/4152.
Badarudin, B.R.H. and Khalid, M., 2008. Using the Jar Model to Improve Students’ Understanding of Operations on Integers. In: D.D. Bock, B.D. Søndergaard, B.G. Alfonso and C.C.L. Cheng, eds. Proceedings of ICME-11 – Topic Study Group 10: Research and Development in the Teaching and Learning of Number Systems and Arithmetic. 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education. July 6-13, 2008. Monterrey, Mexico. pp.85–94. Available from: http://malrep.uum.edu.my/rep/Record/my.iium.irep.36769.
Benavides-Varela, S., Zandonella Callegher, C., Fagiolini, B., Leo, I., Altoè, G. and Lucangeli, D., 2020. Effectiveness of digital-based interventions for children with mathematical learning difficulties: A meta-analysis. Computers & education, 157, p.103953. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103953
Bernardo, A., 2005. The learning process: The neglected phenomenon in science and mathematics education reform in the Philippines. In: E.B. Ogena and F.G. Brawner, eds. Science Education in the Philippines: Challenges for Development. Metro Manila: Science Education Institute, National Academy of Science and Technology, Center for Integrative Development Studies, University of the Philippines.
Bofferding, L., 2014. Negative integer understanding: Characterizing first graders’ mental models. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(2), pp.194–245. Available from: https://social.education.purdue.edu/bofferding/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Bofferding-Negative-Integer-Understanding.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.2.0194
Boyatzis, R.E., 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Byun, J. and Joung, E., 2018. Digital game-based learning for K–12 mathematics education: A meta-analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 118(3-4), pp.113–126. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12271
Capar, G. and Tarim, K., 2015. Efficacy of the Cooperative Learning Method on Mathematics Achievement and Attitude: A Meta-Analysis Research. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(2), pp.553–559. Available from: https://jestp.com/article-detail/?id=694.
Cemen, P.B., 1993. Teacher to Teacher: Adding and Subtracting Integers on the Number Line. Arithmetic Teacher, 40(7), pp.388–389. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.40.7.0388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.40.7.0388
Creswell, J.W. and Miller, D.L., 2000. Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), pp.124–130. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
Dias, P. and Brito, R., 2021. Criteria for selecting apps: Debating the perceptions of young children, parents and industry stakeholders. Computers & education, 165, p.104134. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104134
Dorouka, P., Papadakis, S. and Kalogiannakis, M., 2021. Nanotechnology and mobile learning: perspectives and opportunities in young children’s education. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(3), pp.237–252. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2021.115975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2021.115975
Gallardo, A., 2002. The extension of the natural-number domain to the integers in the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(2), pp.171–192. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016210906658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016210906658
Ge, L., 2012. Sequences of multiple representations in mathematics education. Journal of Applied Global Research, 5(14), pp.10–18. Available from: https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A5%3A5540293/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A94267085&crl=c.
Guest, G., Bunce, A. and Johnson, L., 2006. How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), pp.59–82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Handayani, Y. and Aini, I.N., 2019. Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Pada Materi Peluang. Prosiding Sesiomadika, 2(1b). Available from: https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/sesiomadika/article/view/2826.
Hartshorn, R. and Boren, S., 1990. Experiential Learning of Mathematics: Using Manipulatives. (ERIC Digest ED321967). ERIC. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED321967.
Hill, W.F., 1960. Learning theory and the acquisition of values. Psychological Review, 67(5), pp.317–331. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043097
Kamina, P. and Iyer, N.N., 2009. From Concrete to Abstract: Teaching for Transfer of Learning when Using Manipulatives. NERA Conference Proceedings 2009. p.6. Available from: https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/nera_2009/6.
Keşan, C., Yılmaz, S. and Altınok, A., 2005. İlköğretim 7 Sınıf Tamsayılar Konusunun Günlük Yaşamla İlişkilendirilmesi ve Öğrenci Üzerindeki Etkileri. Xiv. ulusal eğitim bilimleri kongresi: Pamukkale Üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi, 28-30 eylül 2005, denizli : kongre kitabı. Denizli: Pamukkale Üniversitesi. Eğitim Fakültesi.
Kinach, B.M., 2002. A cognitive strategy for developing pedagogical content knowledge in the secondary mathematics methods course: toward a model of effective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), pp.51–71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00050-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00050-6
Kul, Ü. and Çelik, S., 2020. A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Problem Posing Strategies on Students’ Learning of Mathematics. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), pp.341–368. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/325
Lavidas, K., Apostolou, Z. and Papadakis, S., 2022. Challenges and Opportunities of Mathematics in Digital Times: Preschool Teachers’ Views. Education Sciences, 12(7), p.459. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070459
Lourenço, O.M., 2016. Developmental stages, piagetian stages in particular: A critical review. New Ideas in Psychology, 40, pp.123–137. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.08.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.08.002
Maslow, A.H., 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), pp.370–396. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
Meeks, L., Heit, P., Page, R. and Ward, P., 2024. Comprehensive School Health Education: Totally Awesome Strategies for Teaching Health. 10th ed. McGraw Hill.
Miller, J.L., 2013. A Curriculum Study: Teaching Integer Addition and Subtraction Using a Net Worth Concept. A thesis project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Education. State University of New York College at Brockport. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/5561.
Modiba, M., 2011. Even the ‘Best’ Teachers May Need Adequate Subject Knowledge: An Illustrative Mathematics Case Study. Research in Education, 85(1), pp.1–16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.85.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.85.1
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. Available from: https://bibliotecadigital.mineduc.cl/bitstream/handle/20.500.12365/17719/Principles%20and%20Standards%20for%20School%20Mathematics.pdf.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2014. Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. Available from: http://areaiihsmap.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/109255672/Principles.To.Actions.ebook.pdf.
Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M. and Zaranis, N., 2018. The effectiveness of computer and tablet assisted intervention in early childhood students’ understanding of numbers. An empirical study conducted in Greece. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), pp.1849–1871. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9693-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9693-7
Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M. and Zaranis, N., 2021. Teaching mathematics with mobile devices and the Realistic Mathematical Education (RME) approach in kindergarten. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(1), pp.5–18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2021.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2021.01.002
Richland, L.E., Begolli, K.N., Simms, N., Frausel, R.R. and Lyons, E.A., 2017. Supporting Mathematical Discussions: the Roles of Comparison and Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), pp.41–53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9382-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9382-2
Ross, R. and Kurtz, R., 1993. Making Manipulatives Work: A Strategy for Success. Arithmetic Teacher, 40(5), pp.254–257. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.40.5.0254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.40.5.0254
Sarama, J. and Clements, D.H., 2016. Physical and Virtual Manipulatives: What Is “Concrete”? In: P.S. Moyer-Packenham, ed. International Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Virtual Manipulatives. Cham: Springer International Publishing, Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol. 7, pp.71–93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32718-1_4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32718-1_4
Schoenfeld, A.H., 2006. Mathematics Teaching and Learning. In: P.A. Alexander and P.H. Winne, eds. Handbook of Educational Psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, chap. 21. Available from: http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~jbaldwin/pub/schoenfeld.
Stephan, M., 2003. Reconceptualizing Linear Measurement Studies: The Development of Three Monograph Themes. In: N. Pateman, ed. Supporting Students’ Development of Measuring Conceptions: Analyzing Students’ Learning in Social Context. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 12, chap. 2, pp.17–35. Available from: http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/31053/1/364.pdf.
Vetter, M., Orr, R., O’Dwyer, N. and O’Connor, H., 2020. Effectiveness of Active Learning that Combines Physical Activity and Math in Schoolchildren: A Systematic Review. Journal of School Health, 90(4), pp.306–318. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12878
Vlassis, J., 2004. Making sense of the minus sign or becoming flexible in ‘negativity’. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), pp.469–484. The Conceptual Change Approach to Mathematics Learning and Teaching. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.012
Vlassis, J., 2008. The Role of Mathematical Symbols in the Development of Number Conceptualization: The Case of the Minus Sign. Philosophical Psychology, 21(4), pp.555–570. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080802285552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080802285552
Vlassis, J. and Demonty, I., 2022. The role of algebraic thinking in dealing with negative numbers. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 54(6), pp.1243–1255. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01402-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01402-1
Xie, C., Cheung, A.C.K., Lau, W.W.F. and Slavin, R.E., 2020. The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Mathematics Achievement in Mainland China: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, p.101565. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101565
Zajda, J., 2021. Constructivist Learning Theory and Creating Effective Learning Environments. Globalisation and Education Reforms: Creating Effective Learning Environments. Cham: Springer International Publishing, Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, vol. 25, pp.35–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Cristina P. Acosta, Bernadette L. Soliba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Accepted 2024-02-09
Published 2024-03-20