The transformative power of artificial intelligence in science education: a pedagogical perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55056/seq.1013

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, science pedagogy, chemistry education, AI ethics, TPACK, sociocultural theory

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education is reshaping science pedagogy in ways that remain insufficiently explored. While early implementations of AI in teaching show promise – particularly through intelligent tutoring systems, virtual laboratories, and adaptive learning tools – there is a critical gap in understanding how these technologies affect conceptual learning across specific science disciplines. This review identifies underexplored areas, including AI’s impact on science epistemology, equity challenges, and educators’ professional readiness. Drawing on recent literature, the paper provides discipline-specific analysis across chemistry, physics, and biology, highlighting pedagogical benefits, ethical complexities, and future research needs. To strengthen theoretical contributions, we present an original framework grounded in Vygotsky’s sociocultural learning theory and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), integrating AI as a mediational tool. This novel analytical perspective allows us to evaluate AI not just as content delivery but as a culturally situated educational artefact. Ultimately, we advocate for a human-centred, critically reflective framework that supports personalised, inquiry-based, and ethical science education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract views: 319 / PDF views: 230

References

Adams, C., Pente, P., Lemermeyer, G., Turville, J. and Rockwell, G., 2022. Artificial intelligence and teachers’ new ethical obligations. The International Review of Information Ethics, 31(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.29173/irie483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/irie483

Akgun, S. and Greenhow, C., 2022. Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), pp.431–440. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7

Aleven, V., Roll, I., McLaren, B.M. and Koedinger, K.R., 2016. Help helps, but only so much: Research on help seeking with intelligent tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), pp.205–223. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0089-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0089-1

Araújo, J.L. and Saúde, I., 2024. Can ChatGPT enhance chemistry laboratory teaching? Using prompt engineering to enable AI in generating laboratory activities. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(5), pp.1858–1864. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00745

Aravantinos, S., Lavidas, K., Voulgari, I., Papadakis, S., Karalis, T. and Komis, V., 2024. Educational Approaches with AI in Primary School Settings: A Systematic Review of the Literature Available in Scopus. Education Sciences, 14(7), p.744. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070744

Ariely, M., Nazaretsky, T. and Alexandron, G., 2024. Causal-mechanical explanations in biology: Applying automated assessment for personalized learning in the science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(8), pp.1858–1889. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21929

Aripin, I., Gaffar, A.A., Jabar, M.B.A. and Yulianti, D., 2024. Artificial intelligence in biology and learning biology: A literature review. Jurnal Mangifera Edu, 8(2), pp.41–48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31943/mangiferaedu.v8i2.185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31943/mangiferaedu.v8i2.185

Arun Kumar, U., Mahendran, G. and Gobhinath, S., 2023. A Review on Artificial Intelligence Based E-Learning System. In: G. Ranganathan, R. Bestak and X. Fernando, eds. Pervasive Computing and Social Networking, Lecture notes in networks and systems, vol. 475. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, pp.659–671. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2840-6_50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2840-6_50

Bano, M. and Zowghi, D., 2013. Users’ involvement in requirements engineering and system success. 2013 3rd International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE). IEEE, pp.24–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2013.6615212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2013.6615212

Bogusevschi, D., Muntean, C. and Muntean, G.M., 2020. Teaching and learning physics using 3D virtual learning environment: A case study of combined virtual reality and virtual laboratory in secondary school. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 39(1), pp.5–18. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1248093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70725/297454nsjryb

Booth, A., Martyn-St James, M., Clowes, M. and Sutton, A., 2021. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications. Available from: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/systematic-approaches-to-a-successful-literature-review/book270933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036232009

Bruneau, P., Wang, J., Cao, L. and Truong, H., 2023. The potential of ChatGPT to enhance physics education in Vietnamese high schools. Preprint. Available from: https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/36qw9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/36qw9

Bruner, J., 1981. Vygotski: Una perspectiva histórica y conceptual. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 4(14), pp.3–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.1981.10821841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.1981.10821841

Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernandez-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B. and Barro, S., 2023. AI literacy in K-12: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM education, 10, p.29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7

Cathrin, S. and Wikandaru, R., 2023. The future of character education in the era of artificial intelligence. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 23(1), pp.91–100. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v23i1.59741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v23i1.59741

Chiu, T.K., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C.S. and Cheng, M., 2023. Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, p.100118. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118

Clark, T.M., 2023. Investigating the use of an artificial intelligence chatbot with general chemistry exam questions. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(5), pp.1905–1916. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00027

Cooper, G., 2023. Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, pp.444–452. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y

Daher, W., Diab, H. and Rayan, A., 2023. Artificial intelligence generative tools and conceptual knowledge in problem solving in chemistry. Information, 14(7), p.409. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/info14070409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info14070409

Daniels, H., 2001. Vygotsky and Pedagogy. London, United Kingdom: Routledge. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203469576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203469576

Elmensery, M., 2025. A partnership between Ain Shams University Faculty of Science and PraxiLabs: A Milestone in Practical Education. Available from: https://praxilabs.com/en/blog/2025/05/21/ainshams-university-and-praxilabs/.

Erduran, S. and Levrini, O., 2024. The impact of artificial intelligence on scientific practices: an emergent area of research for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 46(18), pp.1982–1989. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2306604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2306604

Hanna, M.G., Pantanowitz, L., Jackson, B., Palmer, O., Visweswaran, S., Pantanowitz, J. and Rashidi, H.H., 2025. Ethical and bias considerations in artificial intelligence/machine learning. Modern Pathology, 38(3), p.100686. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100686

Hermansyah, M., Najib, A., Farida, A., Sacipto, R. and Rintyarna, B.S., 2023. Artificial intelligence and ethics: Building an artificial intelligence system that ensures privacy and social justice. International Journal of Science and Society, 5(1), pp.154–168. Available from: https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v5i1.644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v5i1.644

Holmes, W., Bialik, M. and Fadel, C., 2019. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston, MA: The Center for Curriculum Redesign. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332180327.

Iyamuremye, A. and Ndihokubwayo, K., 2024. Exploring secondary school students’ interest and mastery of atomic structure and chemical bonding through ChatGPT. Educational Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 1(1), pp.1–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.58197/prbl/9hk37296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58197/prbl/9hk37296

Iyamuremye, A., Niyonzima, F. and Mukiza, J.a.a., 2024. Utilization of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in chemistry education: A critical review. Discover Education, 3(95). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00197-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00197-5

Iyer, A. and Zavacki, C., 2024. Reflecting on ChatGPT in our Chemistry Classroom. AACT Periodical, May 2024 issue. Available from: https://teachchemistry.org/periodical/issues/may-2024/reflecting-on-chatgpt-in-our-chemistry-classroom.

Jensen, L.S. and Konradsen, F., 2018. A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 23, pp.1515–1529. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0

Jia, F., Sun, D. and Looi, C., 2024. Artificial Intelligence in Science Education (2013-2023): Research trends in ten years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(1), pp.94–117. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10077-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10077-6

Koedinger, K.R., Booth, J.L. and Klahr, D., 2013. Instructional complexity and the science to constrain it. Science, 342(6161), pp.935–937. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1238056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1238056

Kotsis, K.T., 2024. ChatGPT in teaching physics hands-on experiments in primary school. European Journal of Education Studies, 11(10), pp.126–143. Available from: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i10.5549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i10.5549

Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D. and Siemens, G., 2017. Piecing the learning analytics puzzle: a consolidated model of a field of research and practice. Learning: Research and Practice, 3(1), pp.63–78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2017.1286142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2017.1286142

Küchemann, S., Steinert, S., Revenga, N., Schweinberger, M., Dinc, Y., Avila, K.E. and Kuhn, J., 2023. Can ChatGPT support prospective teachers in physics task development? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), p.020128. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020128

Lavidas, K., Voulgari, I., Papadakis, S., Athanassopoulos, S., Anastasiou, A., Filippidi, A., Komis, V. and Karacapilidis, N., 2024. Determinants of humanities and social sciences students’ intentions to use artificial intelligence applications for academic purposes. Information, 15(6), p.314. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060314

López-Simó, V. and Rezende Jr., M.F., 2024. Challenging ChatGPT with different types of physics education questions. The Physics Teacher, 62(4), pp.290–294. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0160160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0160160

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M. and Forcier, L.B., 2016. Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson / UCL Knowledge Lab. Available from: https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/edu.google.com/en//pdfs/Intelligence-Unleashed-Publication.pdf.

Makransky, G., Andreasen, N.K., Baceviciute, S. and Mayer, R.E., 2021. Immersive virtual reality increases liking but not learning with a science simulation and generative learning strategies promote learning in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), p.719–735. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000473

Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T.S. and Mayer, R.E., 2019. Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, pp.225–236. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007

Matazu, S.S., 2024. Impact of AI-Blended Learning and AI-Personalized Learning on undergraduate biology students’ attitude and performance in climate change education. Anchor University Journal of Science and Technology, 5(1), pp.83–95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4314/aujst.v5i1.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/aujst.v5i1.8

Mercan, G. and Selçuk, Z.V., 2024. Revolutionizing biology education through Artificial Intelligence: pedagogical strategies, innovations, and ethical frameworks. In: A.A. Khan and O.T. Ozturk, eds. Studies on Social and Education Sciences 2024. Monument, CO, USA: ISTES Organization, pp.112–131. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387742934.

Mishra, P. and Koehler, M.J., 2006. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), pp.1017–1054. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. and Altman, D.G., 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), p.e1000097. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Nguyen, A., Ngo, H.N., Hong, Y., Dang, B. and Nguyen, B.P.T., 2023. Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), pp.4221–4241. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w

Nja, C.O., Idiege, K.J., Uwe, U.E., Meremikwu, A.N., Ekon, E.E., Erim, C.M., Ukah, J.U., Eyo, E.O., Anari, M.I. and Umalili, B., 2023. Adoption of artificial intelligence in science teaching: From the vantage point of the African science teachers. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), p.42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00261-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00261-x

Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M. and Koedinger, K.R., 2011. Metacognitive Practice Makes Perfect: Improving Students’ Self-Assessment Skills with an Intelligent Tutoring System. Artificial Intelligence in Education – AIED 2011, Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 6738. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp.288–295. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_38

Schunk, D.H., 2012. Learning theories: An educational perspective. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education. Available from: https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=FZq4cQAACAAJ.

Selvam, A.A.A., 2024. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on transforming physics, chemistry, and biology education. Journal of Science with Impact, 2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21428/a70c814c.747297aa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21428/a70c814c.747297aa

Snyder, H., 2019. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, pp.333–339. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Spasopoulos, T., Sotiropoulos, D. and Kalogiannakis, M., 2025. Generative AI in Pre-Service Science Teacher Education: A Systematic Review. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 5(2), pp.1501–1523. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2025.02.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2025.02.007

Tan, L.Y., Hu, S., Yeo, D.J. and Cheong, K.H., 2025. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Adaptive Learning Platforms: A Review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, p.100429. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100429

Tang, K.S. and Cooper, G., 2025. The role of materiality in an era of generative artificial intelligence. Science & Education, 34(2), pp.731–746. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00508-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00508-0

Tang, K.S. and Cooper, G., 2025. The Role of Materiality in an Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Science & Education, 34(2), Apr, pp.731–746. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00508-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00508-0

Timmons, A.C., Duong, J.B., Simo Fiallo, N., Lee, T., Vo, H.P.Q., Ahle, M.W., Comer, J.S., Brewer, L.C., Frazier, S.L. and Chaspari, T., 2023. A call to action on assessing and mitigating bias in artificial intelligence applications for mental health. Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 18(5), pp.1062–1096. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221134490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221134490

Udourioh, G.A., Ikegwu, A.C. and Nweke, P.I., 2025. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Innovations in Chemistry Education: Transforming Teaching and Learning Practices. In: P.A. Okebukola, ed. Handbook in Artificial Intelligence and Quality Higher Education: A book in honour of Abubakar Adamu Rasheed, vol. 1. Sterling Publishers, pp.379–388. Available from: https://www.scribd.com/document/838856513.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, 2023. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recommendations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Available from: https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf.

Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. Available from: https://w.pauldowling.me/rtf/2021.1/readings/LSVygotsky_1978_MindinSocietyDevelopmentofHigherPsycholo.pdf.

Williamson, B. and Eynon, R., 2020. Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), pp.223–235. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995

Winkelmann, K., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Fowler, D. and Macik, M.L., 2017. Development, Implementation, and Assessment of General Chemistry Lab Experiments Performed in the Virtual World of Second Life. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(7), pp.849–858. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00733

Yakin, A., Khang, A., Muthmainnah, M., Elngar, A.A., Siripipatthanakul, S. and Limna, P., 2024. Unraveling the Quantum Robotics Influence: Transforming Social Interaction for the Future. In: A. Khang and K.C. Rath, eds. The Quantum Evolution: Application of AI and Robotics in the Future of Quantum Technology. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, pp.349–372. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781032642079-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781032642079-17

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M. and Gouverneur, F., 2019. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), pp.1–27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhai, X., P., H. and Krajcik, J., 2022. Applying machine learning to automatically access scientific models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(10), pp.1765–1794. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21773

Downloads

Published

2026-01-25

Issue

Section

Perspective articles

How to Cite

Nweke, P.I. and Udourioh, G., 2026. The transformative power of artificial intelligence in science education: a pedagogical perspective. Science Education Quarterly [Online], 3(1), pp.30–43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.55056/seq.1013 [Accessed 29 April 2026].
Received 2025-06-15
Accepted 2025-09-29
Published 2026-01-25