Environmental factors influencing girls’ participation in science education in Tanzanian secondary schools

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55056/seq.887

Keywords:

environment, girls, science

Abstract

This paper examines the environmental influences on girls’ participation in science education in Tanzanian secondary schools. A multiple qualitative case study research design was adopted to capture the experiences of 40 participants involved in the teaching and learning processes. Data analysis followed Braun and Clarke six stages of thematic analysis. Findings from observations, interviews, focus group discussions, and documentary reviews indicated that girls faced different environmental challenges, resulting in their poor participation in the related fields. However, teachers improved the participation of girls in science by creating a conducive learning environment by providing personal advice, creating a friendly learning environment, providing girls with opportunities to learn, using motivational techniques, and building confidence in girls in science. The study recommends collaborative efforts to improve girls’ participation in learning the subjects. In addition, a larger sample investigation should be conducted to understand better the situation in different educational settings in the country.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract views: 327 / PDF views: 156

References

Aciksoz, A., Ozkan, Y.Ö. and Dokme, I., 2020. Adaptation of the STEM Value-expectancy assessment scale to Turkish Culture. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(2), pp.177–190. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.723408.

Akhmadi, S. and Tsakalerou, M., 2023. Exploring gender imbalances in innovation and entrepreneurship: evidence from a global south country. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 15(3), pp.275–292. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-08-2022-0145.

Assey, E.S., Malingumu, W. and Babyegeya, E., 2022. Factors that hinder community-based secondary schools in Tanzania from implementing the curriculum effectively: A case study of Tabora region. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(3), pp.34–51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.967.

Babatunde, V.O. and Olanrewaju, B.Y., 2023. Increasing female participation in STEM. The Nigerian Educational Digest (NED), 15(1), pp.90–95. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/124652687/Increasing_Female_Participation_in_Stem.

Bandura, A., 1971. Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press. Available from: https://www.asecib.ase.ro/mps/Bandura_SocialLearningTheory.pdf.

Bandura, A., 1977. Social learning theory. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A., 1986. Social Foundation of Thoughts and Actions: A Social Cognitive Theory. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp.77–101. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Chapman, S. and Vivian, R., 2017. Engaging the future of STEM: A study of international best practice for promoting the participation of young people, particularly girls, in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM). Sydney, New South Wales: Chief Executive Women. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20230308161542/https://cew.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Engaging-the-future-of-STEM.pdf.

Chesky, N. and Goldstein, R., 2018. Packaging Girls for STEM or STEM for Girls? A critique on the perceived crisis of increasing female representation in STEM education. Critical Education, 9(16), pp.98–126. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v9i16.186415.

Chiang, F.K., Tang, Z., Zhu, D. and Bao, X., 2024. Gender disparity in STEM education: a survey research on girl participants in World Robot Olympiad. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(2), Apr, pp.629–646. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09830-0.

Cimpian, J.R., Lubienski, S.T., Timmer, J.D., Makowski, M.B. and Miller, E.K., 2016. Have Gender Gaps in Math Closed? Achievement, Teacher Perceptions, and Learning Behaviors Across Two ECLS-K Cohorts. AERA Open, 2(4), p.2332858416673617. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416673617.

Clawson, B., 2019. Teacher perceptions of STEM teaching methods and implementation in the self determination theory in middle school mathematics teachers: Understanding the Motivation to attain Professional Development secondary classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Carson-Newman University.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K., 2018. Research Methods in Education. 8th ed. London: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.

Costa, L., Lima, Y., Moura Santos, A., Xexéo, G., Prada, R. and Souza, J., 2020. Initiatives for gender equality in STEM education: The Brazilian case. ICERI2020 Proceedings. IATED, 13th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, pp.1253–1260. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2020.0330.

Creswell, J.W., 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education. Available from: https://eclass.uoa.gr/modules/document/file.php/ECD433/%CE%91%CE%BD%CE%AC%CE%BB%CF%85%CF%83%CE%B7%20%CE%B4%CE%B5%CE%B4%CE%BF%CE%BC%CE%AD%CE%BD%CF%89%CE%BD%20%CE%BC%CE%B5%20%CF%84%CE%BF%20SPSS/%CE%92%CE%B9%CE%B2%CE%BB%CE%B9%CE%BF%CE%B3%CF%81%CE%B1%CF%86%CE%AF%CE%B1/John%20W.%20Creswell%20-%20Educational%20Research_%20Planning%2C%20Conducting%2C%20and%20Evaluating%20Quantitative%20and%20Qualitative%20Research%2C%204th%20Edition%20%282011%2C%20Addison%20Wesley%29.pdf.

Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D., 2018. The Selection of a Research Approach. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc., chap. 1. Available from: https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf.

Dawadi, S., 2020. Thematic Analysis Approach: A Step by Step Guide for ELT Research Practitioners. Journal of NELTA, 25(1-2), pp.62–71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v25i1-2.49731.

De Loof, H., Struyf, A., Pauw, J. Boeve-de and Van Petegem, P., 2021. Teachers’ Motivating Style and Students’ Motivation and Engagement in STEM: the Relationship Between Three Key Educational Concepts. Research in Science Educations, 51(1), Sep, pp.109–127. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9830-3.

Dost, G., 2024. ‘STEM belonging’: the association between stereotype vulnerability, COVID-19 stress, general self-efficacy, multidimensional perceived social support, and STEM interest among Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematical Science students. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 29(1), p.2394209. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2024.2394209.

Drisko, J.W., 2025. Transferability and Generalization in Qualitative Research. Research on Social Work Practice, 35(1), pp.102–110. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315241256560.

Effah, H. and Kaufman, A., 2022. “It’s not perfect, but the needle has moved”: Women’s Experiences in Academic STEM. Toronto, ON: The Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario. Available from: https://heqco.ca/women-in-academia-intro-to-part-five/.

Ertl, B., Luttenberger, S. and Paechter, M., 2017. The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on the Self-Concept of Female Students in STEM Subjects with an Under-Representation of Females. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00703.

European Schoolnet, 2020. STEM gender gap: A way out. Available from: http://www.eun.org/news/detail?articleId=4810467.

Fairhurst, N., Kaoul, R. and Shefeld, S., 2023. Students’ perceptions of their STEM learning environment. Learning Environment Research, 26, pp.977–998. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09463-z.

Fernández García, C.M., Torío-López, S., García-Pérez, O. and Inda-Caro, M., 2019. Parental Support, Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Outcome Expectations and Interests in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Universitas Psychologica, 18(2), July, p.1–15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.upsy18-2.psse.

Gama, A.P.M. and Alves, C.A., 2021. Research Methodology. Family Influence on Performance of Family Small and Medium Enterprises. Singapore: Springer Singapore, chap. 5, pp.59–70. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4846-2_5.

González-Pérez, S., Cabo, R. Mateos de and Sáinz, M., 2020. Girls in STEM: Is It a Female Role-Model Thing? Frontiers in Psychology, 11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02204.

Gunawan, J., 2015. Ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research. Belitung Nursing Journal, 1(1), pp.10–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.4.

Hammond, A., Mutulevich, E.R., Beegle, K. and Kumaraswamy, S.K., 2020. The Equality Equation: Advancing the Participation of Women and Girls in STEM. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10986/34317.

Huberman, M.A., Miles, M.B. and Saldaña, J., 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Inc. Available from: https://www.metodos.work/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Qualitative-Data-Analysis.pdf.

Iroaganachi, M.A., Babalola, Y.T. and Soyemi, D.O., 2021. Environmental factors and STEM career path choice intentions of junior secondary school girls in North-Central Nigeria. Cogent arts and humanities, 8(1), p.1945720. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1945720.

Itika, A.J.M., Nkontagu, H.H., Temu, A.K., Kafanabo, E. and Athuman, C.B., 2017. Factors influencing participation in science education by girls in Tanzanian secondary schools. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Available from: http://www.enpe.no/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/EnPe-Project_FINAL-REPORT-22Feb2019-ED.pdf.

Jimola, A.M. and Jimola, F.E., 2024. Female students and the fields of engineering: Steaming the tide in gender underpresentation for sustainable development. International journal of research in education and science (ijres), 10(3), pp.641–652. Available from: https://doi.org/10.46328/ujres.3459.

Karakose, T., Polat, H., Yirci, R., Tülüba¸s, T., Papadakis, S., Ozdemir, T.Y. and Demirkol, M., 2023. Assessment of the Relationships between Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Classroom Management Anxiety, Academic Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Academic Amotivation and Attitudes toward the Teaching Profession Using Structural Equation Modelling. Mathematics, 11(2), p.449. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020449.

Kelana, J.B., Widodo, A. and Suwarma, I.R., 2024. STEM Learning: How Can Environmental Issues Stimulate Elementary School Students’ Problem-Solving Abilities? Proceedings of the International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Technology (ICTLT 2023). Atlantis Press, pp.234–240. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-206-4_27.

Kerenge, K.M., 2014. The influence of education stakeholders on secondary school students’ enrollment in science subjects: A case study of Dodoma municipality in Tanzania. Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Master of Arts in Education. The University of Dodoma. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/3bchry2x.

Khaldi, K., 2017. Quantitative, Qualitative or Mixed Research: Which Research Paradigm to Use? Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(2), pp.15–24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2017.v7n2p15.

Kihombo, G.A., 2017. Assessment of factors contributing to girls’ school attendance and academic performance on form four National examination in Mbeya Region, Tanzania. Master’s thesis. University of Florida. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20181222225424/http://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/AA/00/06/23/42/00001/Grace_Kihombo_Final_Report_MDP.pdf.

Kinyota, M., 2013. Students’ Perceptions of Factors Influencing Choice of Science Streams in Tanzania Secondary Schools. Master’s thesis. University of Massachusetts Amherts. Available from: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/entities/publication/8de8c88e-5740-4a06-8e75-bd59b54a7b41.

Kinyota, M., 2020. The status of and challenges facing secondary science teaching in Tanzania: a focus on inquiry-based science teaching and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 42(13), pp.2126–2144. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1813348.

Kinyota, M., 2021. A Portrait of the Gender Gap in STEM: A Focus on Identity Formation Among Final-year Undergraduate Students in Tanzania. Journal of Education, Humanities and Sciences, 10(3), pp.1–18. Available from: https://www.jehs.duce.ac.tz/index.php/jehs/article/view/129.

Kinyota, M., 2023. Effects of Role Models on Undergraduate Students’ Academic Performance, Sense of Belongingness, Self-efficacy and Persistence in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Papers in Education and Development, 41(1), pp.66–84. Available from: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ped/article/view/249964.

Kira, E.S. and Komba, S.C., 2015. Comparison between the Understanding Levels of Boys and Girls on the Concepts of Environmental Degradation, Meteorology and Climate Change in Tanzanian Secondary Schools. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 2(4), pp.79–86. Available from: https://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/107.

Kivunja, C. and Kuyini, A., 2017. Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), pp.26–41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26.

Kızılay, E., 2018. The analysis of high school students’ career interest and motivation towards STEM fields. Ph.D. thesis. Gazi University, Ankara.

Kocabas, S., Ozfidan, B. and Burlbaw, L.M., 2020. American STEM Education in Its Global, National, and Linguistic Contexts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), p.em1810. Available from: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108618.

Kolker, M., 2021. The Role of All-Female STEM Spaces in Encouraging High School Girls to Pursue STEM (Fundamental, Diversity). 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. Virtual Conference: ASEE Conferences. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--37890.

Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G., 1982. Establishing Dependability and Confirmability in Naturalistic Inquiry Through an Audit. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (66th, New York, NY, March 19-23, 1982). Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED216019.

Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G., 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Loisoki, B., 2020. Assessment of Teaching and Learning Environment for Science Subjects in Secondary Schools in Mkuranga District, Tanzania. Kivukoni journal, 4(7), pp.156–171. Available from: https://www.mnma.ac.tz/media_doc/journals/attachment/1650556131_1cf878fa87fdef9185cc.pdf.

Lyimo, N.S., Too, J.K. and Kipng’etich, K.J., 2017. Perception of teachers on availability of instructional materials and physical facilities in secondary schools of Arusha District, Tanzania. International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review, 4(5), pp.103–112. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15739/IJEPRR.17.012.

Maison, M., Syamsurizal, Karea, S. and Tanti, T., 2019. Learning environment, students’ beliefs and self-regulation in learning physics: structural equation modeling. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(3), pp.389–403. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.389.

Matete, R.E., 2022. Why are Women Under-represented in STEM in Higher Education in Tanzania? FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 7(2), pp.48–63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32865/fire202172261.

Miller, D.I., Nolla, K.M., Eagly, A.H. and Uttal, D.H., 2018. The Development of Children’s Gender-Science Stereotypes: A Meta-analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist Studies. Child Development, 89(6), pp.1943–1955. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13039.

Moss-Racusin, C.A., Pietri, E.S., Toorn, J. van der and Ashburn-Nardo, L., 2021. Boosting the Sustainable Representation of Women in STEM With Evidence-Based Policy Initiatives. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(1), pp.50–58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220980092.

Mujahidah, N. and Yusdiana, 2023. Application of Albert Bandura’s Social-Cognitive Theories in Teaching and Learning. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(02), pp.2131–2146. Available from: https://jurnal.staialhidayahbogor.ac.id/index.php/ei/article/view/4585.

Mukhwana, A.M., Abuya, T., Matanda, D., Omumbo, J. and Mabuka, J., 2020. Factors which Contribute to or Inhibit Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics in Africa. Nairobi: The African Academy of Sciences. Available from: https://www.nepad.org/file-download/download/public/140073.

Mulenga, N., Daka, H. and Mulenga-Hagane, L.M., 2024. Strategies of improving the performance of girls in Mathematics at secondary school: a case of Lusaka District schools. Global Scientific Journal, 12(1), pp.10–30. Available from: https://www.globalscientificjournal.com/researchpaper/STRATEGIES_OF_IMPROVING_THE_PERFORMANCE_OF_GIRLS_IN_MATHEMATICS_AT_SECONDARY_SCHOOL_A_CASE_OF_LUSAKA_DISTRICT_SCHOOLS.pdf.

Nalichako, J.L. and Komba, A.A., 2014. Students’ Subject Choice in Secondary Schools in Tanzania: A Matter of Students’ Ability and Interests or Forced Circumstances? Open Journal of Social Science, 2(8), pp.49–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.28888.

National Examinations Council of Tanzania, . CSEE 2018 examination results enquiries. Available from: https://onlinesys.necta.go.tz/results/2018/csee/csee.htm.

National Examinations Council of Tanzania, . CSEE 2019 examination results enquiries. Available from: https://onlinesys.necta.go.tz/results/2019/csee/csee.htm.

National Examinations Council of Tanzania, . CSEE 202 examination results enquiries. Available from: https://onlinesys.necta.go.tz/results/2022/csee/index.htm.

National Examinations Council of Tanzania, . CSEE 2020 examination results enquiries. Available from: https://onlinesys.necta.go.tz/results/2020/csee/csee.htm.

National Examinations Council of Tanzania, . CSEE 2021 examination results enquiries. Available from: https://onlinesys.necta.go.tz/results/2021/csee/csee.htm.

National Science Board and National Science Foundation, 2019. Publications output: U.S. trends and international comparisons. Science and Engineering Indicators 2020. NSB-2020-6. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED615534.pdf.

Nchimbi, Z.K., 2023. Female Students’ Accessibility in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Disciplines in Tanzania. International Journal of Academic and Applied Research (IJAAR), 7(6), pp.1–10. Available from: http://ijeais.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/6/IJAAR230601.pdf.

Nwafor, C.E., 2019. Teachers Based Strategies for Motivating Students Interest in Basic Science and technology. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 9(2), pp.53–57. Available from: http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-9%20Issue-2/Series-4/I0902045357.pdf.

O’Brien, L.T., Blodorn, A., Adams, G. and Garcia, D.M., 2015. Ethnic Variation in Gender-STEM Stereotypes and STEM Participation: An Intersectional Approach. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(2), pp.169–180. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/cdp-a0037944.pdf, Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037944.

Okkolin, M., Lehtomäki, E. and Bhalalusesa, E., 2010. The successful education sector development in Tanzania – comment on gender balance and inclusive education. Gender and Education, 22(1), pp.63–71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802555416.

Papadakis, S., Tousia, C. and Polychronaki, K., 2018. Women in computer science. The case study of the Computer Science Department of the University of Crete, Greece. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 9(2), pp.142–151. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTCS.2018.090963.

Patton, M.Q., 1999. Enhancing the Quality and Credibility of Qualitative Analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), pp.1189–1208. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1089059/.

Pesambili, J.C. and Novelli, M., 2021. Maasai students’ encounter with formal education: Their experiences with and perceptions of schooling processes in Monduli, Tanzania. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, p.100044. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100044.

Prebreza, R., Beqiraj, B., Prebreza, B., Krypa, A. and Krypa, M., 2025. Factors influencing the lower number of women in STEM compared to men: A case study from Kosovo. STEM Education, 5(1), pp.19–40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025002.

Rachmatullah, A., Roshayanti, F., Shin, S., Lee, J.K. and Ha, M., 2018. The Secondary-Student Science Learning Motivation in Korea and Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), pp.3123–3141. Available from: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91665.

Roberts, K., 2014. Engaging more women and girls in mathematics and STEM fields: The international evidence. Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3947.8402.

Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M.J., Bush, S.B., Maiorca, C., Cavalcanti, M., Craig Schroeder, D., Delaney, A., Putnam, L. and Cremeans, C., 2018. Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), Sep, p.35. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4.

Robinson, J., 2018. Motivation and gender dynamics in high school science: The effect of gender composition on motivation in small group inquiry and engineering tasks. Ph.D. thesis. University of Massachusetts Amherst. Available from: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/entities/publication/02a69af1-8bdf-4179-8d78-df5daf1ec762.

Safitri, R.S. and Octarisa, N.S., 2023. The relationship between the learning motivation in the 12th grade OTKP students at SMK Amaliah 2. European Journal of Psychology Research, 10(2), pp.12–16. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/mshkn69v.

Salmi, J., Natarajan, D., Mulindwa, I. and World Bank, 2021. Improving gender balance in STEM higher education in Tanzania. In POLICY NOTE. Available from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099830012012110164/pdf/P1750730d795dd01f0bd020d6955cc35bec.pdf.

Sanga, C., Magesa, M.M., Chingonikaya, E. and Kayunze, K.A., 2013. Can e-learning promote participation of female students in STEM disciplines in higher learning institutions of Tanzania? International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 9(3), pp.86–102. Available from: https://www.learntechlib.org/d/130277/.

Schunk, D., Meece, J. and Pintrich, P., 2014. Motivation in Education: Theory, Research and Applications. 4th ed. Pearson Education Limited.

Schunk, D.H. and DiBenedetto, M.K., 2023. Albert Bandura’s legacy in education. Theory Into Practice, 62(3), pp.205–206. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2023.2226560.

Silverman, D., 2017. Doing Qualitative Research. 5th ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Available from: https://www.miguelangelmartinez.net/IMG/pdf/2017_silverman_doing__qualitative_research_book.pdf.

Stahl, N.A. and King, J.R., 2020. Expanding Approaches for Research: Understanding and Using Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(1), pp.26–28. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1320570.pdf.

Sukor, R., Mohd Ayub, A.F., Norhasnida, Z. and Nor Khaizura, A.R., 2017. Influence of Students’ Motivation on Academic Performance among Non-Food Science Students Taking Food Science Course. International journal of academic research in progressive education and development, 6(4), pp.104–112. Available from: https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v6-i4/3528.

Suleiman, E. and Otieno, K.O., 2022. Influence of School Learning Environment on Quality Education in Public Secondary Schools in Arusha City Council, Tanzania. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education, 6(3), pp.58–68. Available from: https://jriiejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/JRIIE-6-3-008.pdf.

Sya’bandari, Y., Aini, R.Q., Rusamana, A.N. and Ha, M., 2021. Indonesian students’ STEM career motivation: a study focused on gender and academic level. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1957(1), p.012029. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1957/1/012029.

Tambunan, H., 2018. The Dominant Factor of Teacher’s Role as A Motivator of Students’ Interest and Motivation in Mathematics Achievement. International Education Studies, 11(4), pp.144–151. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n4p144.

The Dakar Framework for Action: Education for All: meeting our collective commitments (including six regional frameworks for action), 2000. Paris: UNESCO. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000121147.

The United Republic of Tanzania, 2000. The Tanzania Development Vision 2025. Available from: https://hssrc.tamisemi.go.tz/storage/app/uploads/public/5ac/f25/f69/5acf25f695da8390367676.pdf.

Tsakalerou, M., Perveen, A., Ayapbergenov, A. and Rysbekova, A., 2024. The role of environment on women’s perception about their STEM studies: observations from a Global South country. Scientific Reports, 14(1), Jan, p.228. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50571-w.

Tsakalerou, M., Perveen, A., Ayapbergenov, A., Rysbekova, A. and Bakytzhanuly, A., 2022. Understanding the Factors Influencing Women’s Career Trajectories in STEM Education in Kazakhstan. In: E.T. Pereira, C. Costa and Z. Breda, eds. 5th International Conference on Gender Research . pp.230–239. Available from: https://doi.org/10.34190/icgr.5.1.186.

UNESCO, 2017. Cracking the code: girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Paris: UNESCO. Available from: https://doi.org/10.54675/QYHK2407.

UNESCO Office Bangkok and Regional Bureau for Education in Asia and the Pacific, 2020. STEM education for girls and women: breaking barriers and exploring gender inequality in Asia. Paris: UNESCO.

United Republic of Tanzania and Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, 2023. Education and Training Policy 2014. 2023rd

ed. Dodoma: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. Available from: https://www.moe.go.tz/sites/default/files/EDUCATION%20AND%20TRAINING%20POLICY%202014%2C%202023%20EDITION.pdf.

Velayutham, S., 2012. The influence of classroom environment on students’ motivation and self-regulation. Ph.D. thesis. Curtin University. Available from: https://espace.curtin.edu.au/handle/20.500.11937/1717.

Widodo, A. and Astuti, B., 2024. Critical Analysis of Social Cognitive Learning Theory and Its Implementation in Elementary Schools. MANDALIKA : Journal of Social Science, 2(1), Feb., p.6–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.56566/mandalika.v2i1.148.

Xiaoqing, Z. and Abd. Rauf, R.A., 2023. The survey on STEM literacy of science teachers in China. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(3), pp.1–14. Available from: https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/MOJES/article/view/44920.

Yin, R.K., 2016. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. 2nd ed. New York and London: The Gulford Press. Available from: https://eli.johogo.com/Class/Qualitative%20Research.pdf.

Zachmann, K., 2018. Women in STEM: Female Role Models and Gender Equitable Teaching Strategies. Submitted in fulfillment of final requirements for the Master of Arts in Education degree. Saint Catherine University. Available from: https://cdm17519.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/maed/id/188/rec/529.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-25

Data Availability Statement

The authors have made efforts to collect the data, transcribe and Keep it  in files. Thus the process of Data analysis was simplified by the use of software MAXQDA 2020. 

Issue

Section

Research articles

How to Cite

Toto, S.F., Mngarah, D.M. and Bwagilo, H.O., 2025. Environmental factors influencing girls’ participation in science education in Tanzanian secondary schools. Science Education Quarterly [Online], 2(2), pp.57–88. Available from: https://doi.org/10.55056/seq.887 [Accessed 26 October 2025].
Received 2025-01-27
Accepted 2025-04-22
Published 2025-04-25