Stochastic process computational modeling for learning research

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.4498

Keywords:

computational modeling, computer-based simulation, statistical hypothesis significance testing, education, learning research

Abstract

The goal of our research was to compare and systematize several approaches to non-parametric null hypothesis significance testing using computer-based statistical modeling. For teaching purposes, a statistical model for simulation of null hypothesis significance testing was created. The results were analyzed using Fisher's angular transformation, Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Fisher's exact tests. Appropriate software was created, allowing us to recommend new illustrative materials for expressing the limitations of the tests that were examined. Learning investigations as a technique of comprehending inductive statistics has been proposed, based on the fact that modern personal computers can run simulations in a reasonable amount of time with great precision. The collected results revealed that the most often used non-parametric tests for small samples have low power. Traditional null hypothesis significance testing does not allow students to analyze test power because the true differences between samples are unknown. As a result, in Ukrainian statistical education, including PhD studies, the emphasis must shift away from null hypothesis significance testing and toward statistical modeling as a modern and practical approach of establishing scientific hypotheses. This finding is supported by scientific papers and the American Statistical Association's recommendation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract views: 131 / PDF downloads: 74

References

Berkson, J.: In dispraise of the exact test: Do the marginal totals of the 2x2 table contain relevant information respecting the table proportions? Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2(1), 27–42 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3758(78)90019-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3758(78)90019-8

Billiet, P.: The Mann-Whitney U-test – analysis of 2-between-group data with a quantitative response variable (2003), https://psych.unl.edu/psycrs/handcomp/hcmann.PDF

Bilousova, L.I., Kolgatin, O.H., Kolgatina, L.S., Kuzminska, O.H.: Introspection as a condition of students’ self-management in programming training. In: Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Advances in Educational Technology - Volume 1: AET. pp. 142–153. INSTICC, SciTePress (2022). https://doi.org/10.5220/0010922000003364Educational Dimension (2022) https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.4498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.4498

Bilousova, L.I., Kolgatina, L.S., Kolgatin, O.H.: Computer simulation as a method of learning research in computational mathematics. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2393, 880–894 (2019)

Bradley, D.R., Hemstreet, R.L., Ziegenhagen, S.T.: A simulation laboratory for statistics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 24(2), 190–204 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203496, https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/BF03203496.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203496

Castro Sotos, A.E., Vanhoof, S., Van den Noortgate, W., Onghena, P.: How confident are students in their misconceptions about hypothesis tests? Journal of Statistics Education 17(2) (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2009.11889514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2009.11889514

D’Agostino, R.B., Chase, W., Belanger, A.: The appropriateness of some common procedures for testing the equality of two independent binomial populations. The American Statistician 42(3), 198–202 (1988), http://www.jstor.org/stable/2685002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1988.10475563

Fay, M.P., Proschan, M.A.: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rules. Statistics Surveys 4, 1–39 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS051

Flusser, P., Hanna, D.: Computer simulation of the testing of a statistical hypothesis. Mathematics and Computer Education 25(2), 158 (1991), https://www.learntechlib.org/p/144840

Fong, Y., Huang, Y.: Modified Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test and power against strong null. The American Statistician 73(1), 43–49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1328375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1328375

Gubler, Y.V., Genkin, A.A.: Primeneniye Neparametricheskikh Metodov Statistiki v Mediko-Biologicheskikh Issledovaniyakh (Application of Nonparametric Methods of Statistics in Biomedical Research). Meditsina, Leningradskoye otdeleniye, Leningrad (1973)

Jamie, D.M.: Using computer simulation methods to teach statistics: A review of the literature. Journal of Statistics Education 10(1) (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2002.11910548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2002.11910548

Kanji, G.K.: 100 Statistical Tests. SAGE Publications, London - Thousand Oaks - New Delhi (2006)

Khazina, S.A., Ramskyi, Y.S., Eylon, B.S.: Computer modeling as a scientific means of training prospective physics teachers. In: EDULEARN16 Proceedings. pp. 7699–7709. 8th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, IATED (4-6 July 2016). https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2016.0694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2016.0694

Kolgatin, O.: Computer-based simulation of stochastic process for investigation of efficiency of statistical hypothesis testing in pedagogical research. Journal of Information Technologies in Education (ITE) (27), 007–014 (Oct 2016). https://doi.org/10.14308/ite000582, http://ite.kspu.edu/index.php/ite/article/view/101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14308/ite000582

Kolgatin, O.H.: Informatsionnyye tekhnologii v nauchno-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyakh (Information technologies in educational researches). Upravlyayushchiye Sistemy i Mashiny (Control Systems and Machines) 255(1), 66–72 (2015)

Kolgatin, O.H., Kolgatina, L.S., Ponomareva, N.S., Shmeltser, E.O., Uchitel, A.D.: Systematicity of students’ independent work in cloud learning environment of the course "educational electronic resources for primary school" for the future teachers of primary schools. In: Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Advances in Educational Technology - Volume 1: AET. pp. 538–549. INSTICC, SciTePress (2022). https://doi.org/10.5220/0010926000003364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5220/0010926000003364

Kravtsov, H.M.: Methods and technologies for the quality monitoring of electronic educational resources. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1356, 311–325 (2015)

Lang, K.M., Sweet, S.J., Grandfield, E.M.: Getting beyond the Null: Statistical Modeling as an Alternative Framework for Inference in Developmental Science. Research in Human Development 14(4), 287–304 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2017.1371567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2017.1371567

Liddell, D.: Practical tests of 2 × 2 contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician) 25(4), 295–304 (1976). https://doi.org/10.2307/2988087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2988087

Markova, O., Semerikov, S., Popel, M.: CoCalc as a learning tool for neural network simulation in the special course “Foundations of mathematic informatics”. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2104, 388–403 (2018) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31812/0564/2250

Marx, A., Backes, C., Meese, E., Lenhof, H.P., Keller, A.: EDISON-WMW: Exact dynamic programing solution of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics 14(1), 55–61 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2015.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2015.11.004

McShane, B.B., Gal, D., Gelman, A., Robert, C., Tackett, J.L.: Abandon Statistical Significance. The American Statistician 73(sup1), 235–245 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1527253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1527253

Modlo, Y.O., Semerikov, S.O.: Xcos on Web as a promising learning tool for Bachelor’s of Electromechanics modeling of technical objects. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2168, 34–41 (2018) DOI: https://doi.org/10.55056/cte.133

Preacher, K.J.: Calculation for Fisher’s exact test (2021), http://quantpsy.org/fisher/fisher.html

Ricketts, C., Berry, J.: Teaching statistics through resampling. Teaching Statistics 16(2), 41–44 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9639.1994.tb00685.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9639.1994.tb00685.x

Semerikov, S.O., Teplytskyi, I.O., Yechkalo, Y.V., Kiv, A.E.: Computer Simulation of Neural Networks Using Spreadsheets: The Dawn of the Age of Camelot. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2257, 122–147 (2018) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/2648

Semerikov, S.O., Teplytskyi, I.O., Yechkalo, Y.V., Markova, O.M., Soloviev, V.N.: Computer Simulation of Neural Networks Using Spreadsheets: Dr. Anderson, Welcome Back. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2393, 833–848 (2019) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/3178

Sidorenko, Y.V.: Metody Matematicheskoy Obrabotki v Psikhologii (Methods of Mathematical Processing in Psychology). Rech, St. Petersburg (2002), https://www.sgu.ru/sites/default/files/textdocsfiles/2014/02/19/sidorenko.pdf

Taylor, D.W., Bosch, E.G.: CTS: A clinical trials simulator. Statistics in Medicine 9(7), 787–801 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780090708 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780090708

Verma, J.P.: Data Analysis in Management with SPSS Software. Springer, India (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0786-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0786-3

Wasserstein, R.L., Lazar, N.A.: The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician 70(2), 129–133 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108

Wasserstein, R.L., Schirm, A.L., Lazar, N.A.: Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”. The American Statistician 73(sup1), 1–19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913

Downloads

Published

14-06-2022

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kolgatin, O.H., Kolgatina, L.S. and Ponomareva, N.S., 2022. Stochastic process computational modeling for learning research. Educational Dimension [Online], 6, pp.68–83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.4498 [Accessed 21 February 2024].
Received 2021-06-28
Accepted 2022-02-06
Published 2022-06-14

Similar Articles

1-10 of 126

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.