Peer support among student teachers through close social bonds

Knut-Andreas Abben Christophersen; Eyvind Elstad; Corinna Geppert; Astrid Schmidt; Are Turmo

doi:10.55056/ed.955

Authors

Knut-Andreas Abben Christophersen University of Oslo https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9265-7871
Eyvind Elstad University of Oslo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4369-0040
Corinna Geppert University for Continuing Education Krems https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0823-5766
Astrid Schmidt Kiel University https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2333-4773
Are Turmo University of Oslo https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8300-9201

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55056/ed.955

Keywords:

teacher education, peer support, self-efficacy

Abstract

This study explores the impact of peer support on 471 student teachers during the practicum phase, particularly how such support can influence their motivation and self-efficacy. Questionnaires were distributed to student teachers in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, with all measures based on established scales. The survey was validated for internal consistency, resulting in a high response rate. Data were analysed using structural equation modelling, demonstrating an acceptable fit for the proposed model. The results indicate that motivation to become a teacher is the strongest predictor of peer support; altruistic motivation has a weaker correlation. Additionally, teacher self-efficacy during various practicum phases is positively associated with peer support, whereas perceived disciplinary issues in the classroom negatively impact instructional self-efficacy. These findings highlight the need for structured peer support systems in teacher education to enhance student teachers' experiences and for further research into the dynamics of peer relationships in educational settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract views: 99 / PDF views: 54

References

Adamson, B., 2012. International comparative studies in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), pp.641–648. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.02.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.02.003

Alger, C., 2006. ‘What went well, what didn’t go so well’: growth of reflection in pre-service teachers. Reflective Practice, 7(3), pp.287–301. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940600837327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940600837327

Archer, J., 1994. Achievement Goals as a Measure of Motivation in University Students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), pp.430–446. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1031

Asuo-Baffour, H., Daayeng, A. and Agyemang, O., 2019. Mentorship in teacher education: Challenges and support provided. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(1), pp.257–279. Available from: https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/2404:.

Bandura, A., 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Available from: https://www.asecib.ase.ro/mps/Bandura_SocialLearningTheory.pdf.

Bates, A.B., Latham, N. and Kim, J.a., 2011. Linking Preservice Teachers’ Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Mathematics Teaching Efficacy to Their Mathematical Performance. School Science and Mathematics, 111(7), pp.325–333. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00095.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00095.x

Batson, C.D., Ahmad, N. and Stocks, E.L., 2011. Four Forms of Prosocial Motivation: Egoism, Altruism, Collectivism, and Principlism. In: D. Dunning, ed. Social Motivation. New York: Psychology Press, pp.103–126.

Belogolovsky, E. and Somech, A., 2010. Teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior: Examining the boundary between in-role behavior and extra-role behavior from the perspective of teachers, principals and parents. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), pp.914–923. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.032

Birchinall, L., Spendlove, D. and Buck, R., 2019. In the moment: Does mindfulness hold the key to improving the resilience and wellbeing of pre-service teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, p.102919. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102919

Brandenburg, R., McDonough, S., Burke, J. and White, S., eds, 2016. Teacher Education: Innovation, Intervention and Impact. Springer Singapore. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0785-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0785-9

Brown, T.A., 2015. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, Methodology in the Social Sciences. 2nd ed. New York; London: The Guilford Press. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/4rekhc6v.

Burt, R.S., 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029095

Butler, R. and Neuman, O., 1995. Effects of task and ego achievement goals on help-seeking behaviors and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), pp.261–271. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.87.2.261

Cakıroglu, U., 2012. Comparison Of Novice Programmers’ Performances: Blended Versus Face-To-Face. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), p.135–151. Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/16901/176179.

Çelik, V. and Ekinci, A., 2012. The Effects of Social Capital on School Success. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 2(1), pp.211–223. Available from: https://ijsse.com/sites/default/files/issues/2012/volume%202%20issue%201%20Jan%202012/paper%2015/paper-15.pdf.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K., 2009. Research Methods in Education. 6th ed. London: Routledge. Available from: https://islmblogblog.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/rme-edu-helpline-blogspot-com.pdf.

Crocker, L. and Algina, J., 2008. Introduction To Classical And Modern Test Theory. Cengage Learning. Available from: https://archive.org/details/introductiontoclassicalandmoderntesttheory.

Daly, A.J. and Finnigan, K.S., 2010. A bridge between worlds: understanding network structure to understand change strategy. Journal of Educational Change, 11(2), pp.111–138. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9102-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9102-5

Daly, A.J., Moolenaar, N.M., Liou, Y.H., Tuytens, M. and del Fresno, M., 2015. Why So Difficult? Exploring Negative Relationships between Educational Leaders: The Role of Trust, Climate, and Efficacy. American Journal of Education, 122(1), pp.1–38. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/683288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/683288

Daza, V., Gudmundsdottir, G.B. and Lund, A., 2021. Partnerships as third spaces for professional practice in initial teacher education: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, p.103338. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103338

Deci, E.L., 1975. Intrinsic Motivation, Perspectives in Social Psychology. New York: Plenum Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9

Dille, K.B. and Røkenes, F.M., 2021. Teachers’ professional development in formal online communities: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, p.103431. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103431

Draguns, J.G., 2013. Altruism in Its Personal, Social, and Cultural Contexts: An Introduction. In: D.A. Vakoch, ed. Altruism in Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York, NY: Springer New York, International and Cultural Psychology, pp.1–16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6952-0_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6952-0_1

Dweck, C.S. and Leggett, E.L., 1988. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), pp.256–273. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.95.2.256

Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M.A., eds, 2011. Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons. https://tinyurl.com/4k2pstfw, Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119207245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119207245

Elliot, A.J., 2020. Competition and achievement outcomes: A hierarchical motivational analysis. Motivation Science, 6(1), pp.3–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000164

Fogarty, J.I., Wang, M.C. and Creek, R., 1983. A Descriptive Study of Experienced and Novice Teachers’ Interactive Instructional Thoughts and Actions. The Journal of Educational Research, 77(1), pp.22–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1983.10885491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1983.10885491

Forbes, L. and Billet, S., 2012. Successful Co-Teaching in the Science Classroom. Science Scope, 36(1), pp.61–64.

Gomendio, M., 2017. Empowering and Enabling Teachers to Improve Equity and Outcomes for All. International Summit on the Teaching Profession, Paris: OECD Publishing. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273238-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273238-en

Grande, E., 2023. Civil Society, Cleavage Structures, and Democracy in Germany. German Politics, 32(3), pp.420–439. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/265119/1/Full-text-article-Grande-Civil-society-cleavage.pdf, Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2022.2120610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2022.2120610

Gray, J. and Sime, N., 1989. Findings from the national survey of teachers in England and Wales. Discipline in Schools: Report of the Committee of Enquiry chaired by Lord Elton. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, pp.220–250. Available from: https://www.education-uk.org/documents/elton/elton1989.html.

Gröschner, A., Klaß, S. and Dehne, M., 2018. Lehrer-Schüler Interaktion im Praxissemester lernen? Effekte des videobasierten peer-coaching auf die Kompetenzeinschätzung. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 13(1), pp.45–67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3217/zfhe-13-01/03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3217/zfhe-13-01/03

Häkkinen, P., Virtanen, T., Virtanen, A., Näykki, P., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., Niilo-Rämä, M. and Järvelä, S., 2020. Finnish pre-service teachers’ perceptions of their strategic learning skills and collaboration dispositions. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(1), pp.71–86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2019.1708628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2019.1708628

Haladyna, T.M. and Rodriguez, M.C., 2013. Developing and Validating Test Items. New York: Routledge. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850381

Heiligtag, L.N. and Uhlendorff, U., 2021. Videobasierte Online-Peer-Beratung im Praxissemester. Entwicklungen in einem digitalen Lehr- & Forschungsprojekt für die Begleitung von Praxisphasen. k:ON - Kölner Online Journal für Lehrer*innenbildung, 4(2), pp.181–193. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18716/ojs/kON/2021.2.9.

Herbst, D. and Mas, A., 2015. Peer effects on worker output in the laboratory generalize to the field. Science, 350(6260), pp.545–549. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac9555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac9555

Howard, S.K., Tondeur, J., Ma, J. and Yang, J., 2021. What to teach? Strategies for developing digital competency in preservice teacher training. Computers & Education, 165, p.104149. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104149

Janssen, N., Knoef, M. and Lazonder, A.W., 2019. Technological and pedagogical support for pre-service teachers’ lesson planning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(1), pp.115–128. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1569554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1569554

Jensen, A., 2012. Digital culture, and the viewing/participating pre-service teacher: (re)envisioning theatre teacher training for a social media culture. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 17(4), pp.553–568. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2012.727626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2012.727626

Jürgens, M. and Golenia, M., 2020. E-Peer-Feedback zur Unterstützung Forschenden Lernens im Praxissemester – Konzept und Evaluationsergebnisse. In: B. Fischer and A. Paul, eds. Lehren und Lernen mit und in digitalen Medien im Sport: Grundlagen, Konzepte und Praxisbeispiele zur Sportlehrerbildung. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Bildung und Sport, vol. 18, pp.159–182. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25524-4_9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25524-4_9

Karakose, T., Papadakis, S., Tülübaş, T. and Polat, H., 2022. Understanding the Intellectual Structure and Evolution of Distributed Leadership in Schools: A Science Mapping-Based Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 14(24), p.16779. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416779

Karakose, T., Tülübaş, T. and Papadakis, S., 2023. The scientific evolution of social justice leadership in education: structural and longitudinal analysis of the existing knowledge base, 2003–2022. Frontiers in Education, 8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1139648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1139648

Karakose, T., Tülübaş, T., Papadakis, S. and Yirci, R., 2023. Evaluating the Intellectual Structure of the Knowledge Base on Transformational School Leadership: A Bibliometric and Science Mapping Analysis. Education Sciences, 13(7), p.708. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070708

Klassen, R.M. and Chiu, M.M., 2010. Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), pp.741–756. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237

Klassen, R.M., Perry, N.E. and Frenzel, A.C., 2012. Teachers’ relatedness with students: An underemphasized component of teachers’ basic psychological needs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), pp.150–165. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026253

Kline, R.B., 2016. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Methodology in the Social Sciences. 4th ed. New York; London: Guilford Press. Available from: https://dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files4/befc0f8521c770249dd18726a917cf90.pdf.

Kokkinos, C.M., 2007. Job stressors, personality and burnout in primary school teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), pp.229–243. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X90344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X90344

Korthagen, F.A.J., Kessels, J., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B. and Wubbels, T., 2001. Linking Practice and Theory: The Pedagogy of Realistic Teacher Education. Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600523

Leader-Janssen, E.M. and Rankin-Erickson, J.L., 2013. Preservice Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Self-Efficacy for Teaching Reading. Literacy Research and Instruction, 52(3), pp.204–229. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2013.781253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2013.781253

Lehrkräftebildungsgesetz Schleswig-Holstein (LehrBG) [Teacher Training Act of Schleswig-Holstein], 2014. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20200720101150/http://www.gesetze-rechtsprechung.sh.juris.de/jportal/?quelle=jlink&query=LehrBiG+SH&psml=bsshoprod.psml&max=true.

Lin, N., 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, vol. 19. Cambridge University Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815447

Liou, Y.H., Daly, A.J., Canrinus, E.T., Forbes, C.A., Moolenaar, N.M., Cornelissen, F., Van Lare, M. and Hsiao, J., 2017. Mapping the social side of pre-service teachers: connecting closeness, trust, and efficacy with performance. Teachers and Teaching, 23(6), pp.635–657. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1218329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1218329

McCarthy, S. and Youens, B., 2005. Strategies used by science student teachers for subject knowledge development: a focus on peer support. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(2), pp.149–162. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140500266377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140500266377

Nevins Stanulis, R. and Russell, D., 2000. “Jumping in”: trust and communication in mentoring student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(1), pp.65–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00041-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00041-4

Papay, J.P., Taylor, E.S., Tyler, J.H. and Laski, M., 2016. Learning Job Skills from Colleagues at Work: Evidence from a Field Experiment Using Teacher Performance Data. (Working Paper Series, 21986). National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3386/w21986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w21986

Peitz, J. and Harring, M., eds, 2021. Das Referendariat: Ein systematischer Blick auf den schulpraktischen Vorbereitungsdienst. Münster; New York: Waxmann.

Permatasari, N., Rahmatillah Ashari, F. and Ismail, N., 2021. Contribution of Perceived Social Support (Peer, Family, and Teacher) to Academic Resilience during COVID-19. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 1(1), pp.1–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v1i1.94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v1i1.94

Pil, F.K. and Leana, C., 2009. Applying Organizational Research to Public School Reform: The Effects of Teacher Human and Social Capital on Student Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), pp.1101–1124. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.47084647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.47084647

Rieg, S.A., Paquette, K.R. and Chen, Y., 2007. Coping with stress: an investigation of novice teachers’ stressors in the elementary classroom. Education, 128(2), pp.211–227. Available from: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A175442990/AONE?u=anon~adb108e3&sid=googleScholar&xid=96af0ba9.

Roness, D., 2011. Still motivated? The motivation for teaching during the second year in the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), pp.628–638. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.10.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.10.016

Roßa, A.E., 2013. Zum Verhältnis von Allgemeiner Didaktik und Fachdidaktik in der Lehrerbildung: Einschätzungen von Lehramtsstudierenden zur Fähigkeitsentwicklung in universitären Praxisphasen. Julius Klinkhardt.

Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L., 2000. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), pp.54–67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Sahlberg, P., 2013. The most wanted: Teachers and teacher education in Finland. In: L. Darling-Hammond and A. Liebermann, eds. Teacher Education Around the World: Changing Policies and Practices. London: Routledge, pp.1–21.

Skaalvik, E.M. and Skaalvik, S., 2007. Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), pp.611–625. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611

Spector, B.S., Burkett, R.S. and Steffen, C.O., 2002. Factors Contributing to Preservice Teachers’ Discomfort in a Web-Based Course Structured as an Inquiry. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30(3), pp.293–310. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2190/RCFD-NC5M-3NMM-BQUG. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/RCFD-NC5M-3NMM-BQUG

Steele, A., Brew, C., Rees, C. and Ibrahim-Khan, S., 2013. Our Practice, Their Readiness: Teacher Educators Collaborate to Explore and Improve Preservice Teacher Readiness for Science and Math Instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), pp.111–131. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9311-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9311-2

Steinbrecher, T. and Hart, J., 2012. Examining Teachers’ Personal and Professional Use of Facebook: Recommendations for teacher education programming. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), pp.71–88. Available from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/35265.

Stoughton, E.H., 2007. “How will I get them to behave?”: Pre service teachers reflect on classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), pp.1024–1037. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.001

Strauß, S. and Rohr, D., 2019. Peer-Learning in der Lehrer*innenbildung. Journal für LehrerInnenbildung, 19(3), pp.106–116. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25656/01:18156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35468/jlb-03-2019_11

Sun, M., Loeb, S. and Grissom, J.A., 2017. Building Teacher Teams: Evidence of Positive Spillovers From More Effective Colleagues. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), pp.104–125. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716665698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716665698

Sun, M., Penuel, W.R., Frank, K.A., Gallagher, H.A. and Youngs, P., 2013. Shaping Professional Development to Promote the Diffusion of Instructional Expertise Among Teachers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(3), pp.344–369. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713482763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713482763

Thomas, C. and Hartwell, A., 2024. Peer Support and Pedagogical Conversations: Keys to Building Faculty Capacity in a Digital Age . The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2024.3.17170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2024.3.17170

Topping, K.J., 2023. Digital peer assessment in school teacher education and development: a systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 38(3), pp.472–498. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.1961301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.1961301

Trapp, C.S., 2010. The association among emotional intelligence, resilience, and academic performance of preservice teachers. Ph.D. thesis. University of Phoenix. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/docview/757725760.

Tschannen-Moran, M., 2009. Fostering Teacher Professionalism in Schools: The Role of Leadership Orientation and Trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), pp.217–247. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08330501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08330501

Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., Blais, M.R., Briere, N.M., Senecal, C. and Vallieres, E.F., 1992. The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), pp.1003–1017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025

Vizcaíno-Verdú, A. and Abidin, C., 2023. TeachTok: Teachers of TikTok, micro-celebrification, and fun learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 123, p.103978. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103978

Voss, T., Kunina-Habenicht, O., Hoehne, V. and Kunter, M., 2015. Stichwort Pädagogisches Wissen von Lehrkräften: Empirische Zugänge und Befunde. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 18(2), pp.187–223. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-015-0626-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-015-0626-6

Wagener, U., Reimer, M., Lüschen, I., Schlesier, J. and Moschner, B., 2019. „Krass lehramtsbezogen“ – Lehramtsstudierende wünschen sich mehr Kohärenz in ihrem Studium. Herausforderung Lehrer*innenbildung - Zeitschrift zur Konzeption, Gestaltung und Diskussion (HLZ), 2(1), p.210–226. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4119/hlz-2488.

Wasserman, S. and Faust, K., 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, vol. 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://tinyurl.com/4wcr4ubp, Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478

Wentzel, K.R., Battle, A., Russell, S.L. and Looney, L.B., 2010. Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(3), pp.193–202. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.002

Willegems, V., Consuegra, E., Struyven, K. and Engels, N., 2017. Teachers and pre-service teachers as partners in collaborative teacher research: A systematic literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, pp.230–245. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.014

Yirci, R., Karakose, T., Kocabas, I., Tülübaş, T. and Papadakis, S., 2023. A Bibliometric Review of the Knowledge Base on Mentoring for the Professional Development of School Administrators. Sustainability, 15(4), p.3027. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043027