STEM project design in computer microelectronics education

Halyna V. Tkachuk; Pavlo V. Merzlykin; Ivan I. Donchev

doi:10.55056/cte.929

Authors

Halyna V. Tkachuk Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6926-1589
Pavlo V. Merzlykin Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4017-7172
Ivan I. Donchev South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3373-6562

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55056/cte.929

Keywords:

STEM education, project-based learning, computer microelectronics, Arduino, Tinkercad, virtual simulation, physical implementation, higher education, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge, competency assessment, dual-environment learning, interdisciplinary education

Abstract

STEM education has emerged as a critical approach for developing 21st century skills in higher education students. This paper investigates the implementation of STEM project design in computer microelectronics education, focusing on the integration of virtual simulations using Tinkercad and physical implementation with Arduino microcontrollers. The research demonstrates how this dual approach enhances students' interdisciplinary skills through project-based learning. Drawing on the theoretical foundations of experiential learning, constructionism, and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), the study analyzes the stages of STEM project implementation from problem definition to final presentation. The research reveals that the combination of virtual modeling and physical prototyping creates a comprehensive learning environment that promotes critical thinking, problem-solving, and technical competencies. Assessment frameworks and implementation guidelines derived from this study provide valuable insights for educators seeking to integrate STEM approaches in technical education. The findings contribute to the broader understanding of effective STEM education methodologies while addressing the specific challenges of computer microelectronics instruction in higher education settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract views: 359 / PDF views: 181

References

Adeika, B.I., Abiodun, P.O. and Owolabi, O.A., 2024. Transforming Pedagogical Assessment: AI and Computer Vision-Enhanced Classroom Observations for Experiment-Centric Learning Environments. 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Portland, Oregon: ASEE Conferences. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--48175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--48175

Arikan, S., Erktin, E. and Pesen, M., 2022. Development and Validation of a STEM Competencies Assessment Framework. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(1), pp.1–24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10132-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10132-3

Azeez, F. and Aboobaker, N., 2024. Exploring new frontiers of experiential learning landscape: a hybrid review. Learning Organization, 31(6), pp.985–1007. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-02-2023-0022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-02-2023-0022

Capraro, R.M. and Corlu, M.S., 2013. Changing views on Assessment for STEM Project-Based Learning. In: R.M. Capraro, M.M. Capraro and J.R. Morgan, eds. STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, pp.109–118. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6_12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6_12

Chaudry, A.M., 2020. Using Arduino Uno Microcontroller to Create Interest in Physics. Physics Teacher, 58(6), pp.418–421. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0001841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0001841

Cobian, K.P., Hurtado, S., Romero, A.L. and Gutzwa, J.A., 2024. Enacting inclusive science: Culturally responsive higher education practices in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM). PLoS ONE, 19(1), p.e0293953. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293953

Cole, R., Lantz, J.M., Ruder, S., Reynders, G.J. and Stanford, C., 2018. Enhancing learning by assessing more than content knowledge. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. vol. 2018-June.

Collins, W. and Redden, L., 2021. Improving Student’s Estimating Abilities through Experiential Learning. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 17(2), pp.117–132. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2020.1739178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2020.1739178

Eltanahy, M. and Mansour, N., 2025. Developing a rubric for assessing students’ competencies in entrepreneurial-STEM learning context. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(1), pp.249–265. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2311701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2311701

Faletič, S., 2024. Using Self-assessment Rubrics to Improve Student Project Work and Reduce Instructor Workload. In: E. Aydiner, B.G. Sidharth, M. Michelini and C. Corda, eds. Frontiers of Fundamental Physics FFP16. Cham: Springer International Publishing, Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol. 392, pp.279–298. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38477-6_16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38477-6_16

Ghergulescu, I., Moldovan, A.N., Muntean, C.H. and Muntean, G.M., 2020. Evaluation of an interactive personalised virtual lab in secondary schools. In: H.C. Lane, S. Zvacek and J. Uhomoibhi, eds. Computer supported education. Cham: Springer International Publishing, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 1220, pp.538–556. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58459-7_26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58459-7_26

Hossain, M.A., Deehan, J. and Gibbs, L., 2024. Unveiling the Pedagogical Approaches in STEM Classroom: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(12), pp.1–22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.12.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.12.1

Huang, B. and Jong, M.S.Y., 2020. Developing a Generic Rubric for Evaluating Students’ Work in STEM Education. Proceedings - 2020 International Symposium on Educational Technology, ISET 2020. pp.210–213. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET49818.2020.00053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET49818.2020.00053

Jamaluddin, F., Razak, A.Z.A. and Rahim, S.S.A., 2025. Navigating the challenges and future pathways of STEM education in Asia-Pacific region: A comprehensive scoping review. STEM Education, 5(1), pp.53–88. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025004

Koh, J.H.L., Chai, C.S. and Tsai, C.C., 2013. Examining practicing teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) pathways: A structural equation modeling approach. Instructional Science, 41(4), pp.793–809. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9249-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9249-y

Krainara, S. and Chatmaneerungcharoen, S., 2019. Building a Professional Learning Community with Team Endeavors while Creating Elementary-focused STEM-integrated Lesson Plans. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1), p.012015. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012015

Kurniati, E., Suwono, H., Ibrohim, I., Suryadi, A. and Saefi, M., 2022. International Scientific Collaboration and Research Topics on STEM Education: A Systematic Review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4), p.em2095. Available from: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11903

Li, Y., Shen, Y. and Sukenik, C.I., 2024. Immersive Virtual Labs for Enhancing In-Person and Online Education. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.

Lubis, B.S. and Yus, A., 2024. Mapping knowledge and research trend on technology adoption in higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), pp.24415–24458. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12801-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12801-0

Lynch, T. and Ghergulescu, I., 2017. NEWTON Virtual Labs: Introduction and Teacher Perspective. Proceedings - IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2017. pp.343–345. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.133

Marzoli, I., Rizza, N., Saltarelli, A. and Sampaolesi, E., 2021. Arduino: From Physics to Robotics. In: D. Scaradozzi, L. Guasti, M. Di Stasio, B. Miotti, A. Monteriù and P. Blikstein, eds. Makers at School, Educational Robotics and Innovative Learning Environments. Cham: Springer International Publishing, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 240, pp.309–314. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77040-2_41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77040-2_41

Mirriahi, N., Dawson, S. and Hoven, D., 2012. Identifying key actors for technology adoption in higher education: A social network approach. ASCILITE 2012 - Annual conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education. Available from: https://publications.ascilite.org/index.php/APUB/article/view/1559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2012.1559

Murphy, S., MacDonald, A. and Danaia, L., 2020. Sustaining STEM: A Framework for Effective STEM Education Across the Learning Continuum. In: A. MacDonald, L. Danaia and S. Murphy, eds. STEM Education Across the Learning Continuum: Early Childhood to Senior Secondary. Singapore: Springer Singapore, pp.9–28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2821-7_2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2821-7_2

Nelson, N. and Brennan, R., 2021. LENS: A Model for Engineering Faculty Development. 9th Research in Engineering Education Symposium and 32nd Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, REES AAEE 2021: Engineering Education Research Capability Development. vol. 2, pp.823–831. Available from: https://doi.org/10.52202/066488-0090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52202/066488-0090

Oteri, O.M., 2023. Practical Based E-examination Using the Arduino E-kit for STEM Electronic and Mobile Learning. IET Conference Proceedings, 2023(44), pp.589–594. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2024.1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2024.1020

Pang, S., Lv, G., Zhang, Y. and Yang, Y., 2025. Enhancing students’ science learning using virtual simulation technologies: a systematic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2441676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2441676

Pech, J. and Novak, M., 2020. Use Arduino and Micro:bit as Teaching Platform for the Education Programming and Electronics on the STEM Basis. 2020 5th International Conference on Information Technologies in Engineering Education, Inforino 2020 - Proceedings. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/Inforino48376.2020.9111798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/Inforino48376.2020.9111798

Polly, D., 2011. Teachers’ learning while constructing technology-based instructional resources. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), pp.950–961. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01161.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01161.x

Polly, D. and Byker, E., 2020. Considering the role of zone of proximal development and constructivism in supporting teachers’ TPACK and effective use of technology [Consideración del papel de la Zona de Desarrollo Próximo y el constructivismo en el apoyo al TPACK de los maestros y al uso efectivo de la tecnología]. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 20(64). Available from: https://doi.org/10.6018/RED.408661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/red.408661

Prahani, B.K., Trianggono, M.M., Zahro, I., Siswono, H., Ashadi, F. and Saphira, H.V., 2025. Effectiveness of digital project-based science learning in optimizing student’s creative thinking skills: Alignment with SDG 4 in higher education. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(1), p.e03914. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n01.pe03914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n01.pe03914

Recktenwald, G.W. and Hall, D.E., 2011. Using Arduino as a platform for programming, design and measurement in a freshman engineering course. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.

Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P. and Smith, T., 2022. Principles of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in STEM Education: Using Expert Wisdom and Research to Frame Educational Practice. Education Sciences, 12(10), p.728. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728

Sujarwanto, E., Madlazim and Sanjaya, I.G.M., 2021. A conceptual framework of STEM education based on the Indonesian Curriculum. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1), p.012022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012022

Toma, R.B., Yánez-Pérez, I. and Meneses-Villagrá, J.Á., 2024. Towards a Socio-Constructivist Didactic Model for Integrated STEM Education. Interchange, 55(1), pp.75–91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-024-09513-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-024-09513-2

Tselegkaridis, S., Sapounidis, T. and Papakostas, D., 2024. Learning Circuits and Coding with Arduino Board in Higher Education Using Tangible and Graphical User Interfaces. Information, 15(5), p.245. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/info15050245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info15050245

Vrioni, A., Mavroudi, A. and Ioannou, I., 2021. Promoting Authentic Student Assessment for STEM Project-Based Learning Activities. In: M.E. Auer and T. Tsiatsos, eds. Internet of Things, Infrastructures and Mobile Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1192, pp.117–126. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49932-7_12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49932-7_12

Weng, X., Jong, M.S.Y. and Chiu, T.K.F., 2020. Implementation challenges of STEM education: From Teachers’ perspective. ICCE 2020 - 28th International Conference on Computers in Education, Proceedings. vol. 1, pp.683–685.

Woodhall, T.F. and Strong, D.S., 2009. Development of rubric-based assessment methodology for student design projects. DS 58-10: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design. vol. 10, pp.281–288.

Yata, C., Ohtani, T. and Isobe, M., 2020. Conceptual framework of STEM based on Japanese subject principles. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), p.12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00205-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00205-8

Zeeshan, K., Watanabe, C. and Neittaanmaki, P., 2021. Problem-solving skill development through STEM learning approaches. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. vol. 2021-October. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637226

Zhang, J., Zhou, M. and Zhang, X., 2023. Interventions to promote teachers’ perceptions about STEM education: A meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), pp.7355–7390. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11492-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11492-9

Zizka, L., McGunagle, D.M. and Clark, P.J., 2021. Sustainability in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) programs: Authentic engagement through a community-based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, p.123715. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123715