Digital leadership: shaping school effectiveness in the digital era - a meta-analysis

John Olayemi Okunlola

doi:10.55056/etq.972

Authors

John Olayemi Okunlola University of Johannesburg https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7234-0504

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.972

Keywords:

digital leadership, school effectiveness, meta-analysis, Fourth Industrial Revolution

Abstract

This meta-analysis examines the relationship between digital leadership and school effectiveness in the digital era, synthesising evidence from 11 empirical studies across six countries. Against the backdrop of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which has transformed educational paradigms through technologies like AI, IoT, and ICT, digital leadership has emerged as a critical factor in enhancing institutional outcomes. The study addresses five research questions, employing PRISMA-guided methodology to analyse peer-reviewed studies (2010--2024) from Scopus, Semantic Scholar, and Google Scholar. Using JASP 0.16.4 for random-effects modelling, the analysis revealed a robust pooled effect size (r = 0.672, p < 0.001), confirming digital leadership's significant positive impact on school effectiveness. Subgroup analyses showed notable variability, with Thailand (r = 0.784) and Malaysia (r = 0.553) demonstrating the strongest effects, while Indonesia (r = 0.123) and Bahrain (r = 0.209) exhibited weaker but still significant correlations. Publication bias assessments, including funnel plot asymmetry and trim-and-fill analysis, indicated minor bias but did not undermine the overall significance of findings. Fail-safe N tests (p = 0.000) further validated the results' robustness. The study highlights the need for context-specific digital leadership frameworks, particularly in regions with limited research representation. Practical implications include prioritising administrator training in data-driven decision-making and ICT integration, while policy recommendations emphasise infrastructure investment and standardised competency frameworks. Limitations include geographic underrepresentation and reliance on correlation-based studies. Future research should expand to underrepresented regions. This meta-analysis contributes to the growing evidence supporting digital leadership as a transformative force in 21st-century education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract views: 135 / PDF views: 88

References

Adriantoni, Vesuden, M. and Herawan, E., 2024. The Influence of Digital Leadership in Higher Education in Improving Academic Services. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 8(4), pp.1208–1222. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v8i4.9413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v8i4.9413

Azrai, E.P., Rini, D.S. and Suryanda, A., 2020. Micro-teaching in the Digital Industrial Era 4.0: Necessary or Not? Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4A), pp.23–30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081804

Battro, A.M. and Fischer, K.W., 2012. Mind, Brain, and Education in the Digital Era. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(1), pp.49–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01137.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01137.x

Berkovich, I. and Hassan, T., 2025. Principals’ digital transformational leadership, teachers’ commitment, and school effectiveness. Education Inquiry, 16(2), pp.177–194. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2173705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2173705

Boonlertrit, S. and Nak-ai, N., 2023. A Study of Relationship between Digital Leadership and School Effectiveness under the Phitsanulok Primary Educational Service Area Office 2. Ratchaphruek Journal, 21(2), pp.175–181. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Ratchaphruekjournal/article/view/264218, Available from: https://doi.org/10.14456/rpjnrru.2023.27.

Chapman, J., 1993. Leadership, school-based decision making and school effectiveness. In: C. Dimmock, ed. School-Based Management and School Effectiveness. London: Routledge. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315824727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315824727

Cheng Soon, C. and Salamzadeh, Y., 2021. The impact of Digital Leadership Competencies on Virtual Team Effectiveness in MNC companies in Penang, Malaysia. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, 8(2), pp.219–253. Available from: https://scientificia.com/index.php/JEBE/article/view/147.

Chomsri, A., Sarnswang, S. and Buasuwan, P., 2020. Innovative leadership of school administrators affecting the effectiveness of World-Class Standard Schools in the digital era under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 1. Available from: http://edad.edu.ku.ac.th/Thesis%20IS%2026/37%20%20Anuchit%20Chomsri.pdf.

Davis, J., Mengersen, K., Bennett, S. and Mazerolle, L., 2014. Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses. Springer-Plus, 3(1), p.511. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-511

Duval, S. and Tweedie, R., 2000. Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel-Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), pp.455–463. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x

Gao, P. and Gao, Y., 2024. How Does Digital Leadership Foster Employee Innovative Behavior: A Cognitive–Affective Processing System Perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 14(5), p.362. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050362

Gibbons, S., 2007. Redefining the Roles of Information Professionals in Higher Education to Engage the Net Generation. EDUCAUSE Australasia 2007. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20120324105152/http://www.caudit.edu.au/educauseaustralasia07/authors_papers/Gibbons2.pdf.

Hamzah, N.H., Nasir, M.K.M. and Wahab, J.A., 2021. The Effects of Principals’ Digital Leadership on Teachers’ Digital Teaching during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Malaysia. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(2), p.216–221. Available from: https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.82.216.221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.82.216.221

Helsper, E.J. and Eynon, R., 2010. Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), pp.503–520. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227

Kandemir, A., 2024. The mediating role of school effectiveness in the relationship between transformational leadership and workplace exclusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1475156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1475156

Karakose, T. and Tülübaş, T., 2023. Digital Leadership and Sustainable School Improvement—A Conceptual Analysis and Implications for Future Research. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(1), pp.7–18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.121.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.121.1

Kearsley, G. and Lynch, W., 1992. Educational Leadership in the Age of Technology: The New Skills. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25(1), pp.50–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1992.10782032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1992.10782032

Khemtong, N., Promchom, K., Thumsen, P. and Wechayalak, N., 2024. Digital Leadership Relationships Among School Administrators with the Effectiveness of Academic Work in the New Normal Era. Higher Education Studies, 14(3), pp.38–47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v14n3p38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v14n3p38

Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P.J., Kleijnen, J. and Moher, D., 2009. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339, p.b2700. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

Mınaz, M.B., Özel, Y. and Ay, M., 2022. The Relationship Between Principals’ Technological Leadership Competence and School Effectiveness. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(4), pp.39–57. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.570

Mohamed Najid, S.N., 2022. Principal’s Pillars of digital leadership practices and school effectiveness amongst teachers at IDRISSI International School, Selangor, Malaysia. Master’s thesis. Universiti Teknologi MARA. Available from: https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/57953/.

Noble, J.H., 2006. Meta-analysis: Methods, strengths, weaknesses, and political uses. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 147(1), pp.7–20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lab.2005.08.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lab.2005.08.006

Oberer, B. and Erkollar, A., 2018. Leadership 4.0: Digital Leaders in the Age of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 7(4), pp.404–412. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2018.60332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2018.60332

Okunlola, J.O., 2024. Digital technology adoption and school leadership in the post-pandemic era: Insights from high school leaders. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 6, pp.1–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2024.vol6.32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2024.vol6.32

Okunlola, J.O., Naicker, S.R. and Uleanya, C., 2024. Digital leadership in the fourth industrial revolution enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Cogent Education, 11(1), p.2317258. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2317258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2317258

Petticrew, M. and Roberts, H., 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing. https://fcsalud.ua.es/en/portal-de-investigacion/documentos/tools-for-the-bibliographic-research/guide-of-systematic-reviews-in-social-sciences.pdf, Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887

Prensky, M., 2001. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 9(5), pp.1–6. https://tinyurl.com/3j7chww7, Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

Rahman, S.A. and Hamid, A.H.A., 2025. Digital Leadership Practices of Principals and Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Secondary Schools. International Journal of Academic Research In Progressive Education and Development, 14(1), pp.1272–1284. Available from: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i1/24822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i1/24822

Samanbutr, N. and Sutsavade, N., 2024. The Digital Leadership Of School Administrators and Effectiveness of Schools under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Nonthaburi. Procedia of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(10), p.38. Available from: https://so09.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PMR/article/view/5335.

Sheninger, E., 2019. Digital Leadership: Changing Paradigms for Changing Times. 2nd ed. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.2528

Sirisooksilp, S., Kampang, K. and Ariratana, W., 2022. The Effect of Digital Leadership on School Administrators Towards Primary School Effectiveness: A Structural Equation Modeling. NeuroQuantology, 20(16), pp.3769–3777. Available from: https://www.neuroquantology.com/open-access/The+Effect+of+Digital+Leadership+on+School+Administrators+Towards+Primary+School+Effectiveness%253AA+Structural+Equation+Modeling_6717/?download=true.

Sterne, J.A.C., Sutton, A.J., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Terrin, N., Jones, D.R., Lau, J., Carpenter, J., Rücker, G., Harbord, R.M., Schmid, C.H., Tetzlaff, J., Deeks, J.J., Peters, J., Macaskill, P., Schwarzer, G., Duval, S., Altman, D.G., Moher, D. and Higgins, J.P.T., 2011. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 343. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4002

Tatlah, I.A. and Iqbal, M.Z., 2012. Leadership Styles and School Effectiveness: Empirical Evidence from Secondary Level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, pp.790–797. International Conference on Education & Educational Psychology (ICEEPSY 2012). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.474

Uman, L.S., 2011. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20(1), pp.57–59.

Willis, B.H. and Quigley, M., 2011. The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), p.163. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-163

Wiyono, B.B., Komariah, A., Alghamdi, A.A., Sultoni and Fahlevi, M., 2023. The Influence of Principals’ e-Leadership on the Effectiveness of Schools’ Public Relations and Organizational Improvement. Sustainability, 15(2), p.1296. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021296