Selecting tools to enhance scholarly communication through the life cycle of scientific research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.19Keywords:
scholarly communication, digital tools for scholarly communication, scientific research, early career researchers, Higher Education InstitutionAbstract
Education and science digitalization belongs to the priority areas of information society development. However, we can observe that while Ukraine enters the European educational and scientific space, Ukrainian scientists cannot yet efficiently compete in the international labor market. One of the reasons behind this is that Ukrainian scientists and researchers are not fully integrated into the world system of digital scholarly communication. To help researchers use digital tools supporting scholarly communication, many companies carry out various educational events to support open science and initiate international research and projects. Under modern conditions the digitalization of scientific communication went to the front-burner due to the COVID-19 pandemic. At the same time, the forced transition to digital scholarly communications through the COVID-19 pandemic can help integrate young scientists into the international scientific space. This article provides an analysis of tools to support scholarly communication developed within the "101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication" project. The international survey demonstrates the tools that scientists prefer to use at each stage of the research. This paper characterizes the advantages of particular tools on different stages of scientific research process induced by the current tendency for scholarly communication digitalization. During the work, we outlined the scope for future research and found it necessary to conduct an additional survey for the scholarly community.
Downloads
References
101 Innovations, 2016. Academic social networks – the Swiss Army Knives of scholarly communication. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/3kzhhvfj.
Bezjak, S., Clyburne-Sherin, A., Conzett, P., Fernandes, P., Görögh, E., Helbig, K., Kramer, B., Labastida, I., Niemeyer, K., Psomopoulos, F., Ross-Hellauer, T., Schneider, R., Tennant, J., Verbakel, E., Brinken, H. and Heller, L., 2018. The Open Science Training Handbook. Available from: https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/content/open-science-training-handbook.
Bielikov, O., 2020. Scientific communication as a component of pedagogical science. Bulletin of the Cherkasy Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University. Series “Pedagogical Sciences”, (1). Available from: https://ped-ejournal.cdu.edu.ua/article/view/36-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31651/2524-2660-2020-1-36-41
Bronnikova, L.V., 2015. Communication in science: New tools for the production of knowledge. Naukovi pratsi. Filosofiia, 257(245), pp.38–42.
Brünger-Weilandt, S., 2007. E-science - advancing new ways of scientific communication. Information Services & Use, 27(4), pp.161–166. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-2007-27406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-2007-27406
Canet, F., 2019. Changing times for scholarly communication: The case of the academic research video and the online video journal. Profesional de la información, 28(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.06
Castelvecchi, D., 2018. Google enters data ecosystem: Dataset Search could be especially helpful to cross-disciplinary researchers. Nature, 561(7722), pp.161–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06201-x
Crouzier, T., 2013. Digital tools for researchers. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20200118101419/http://connectedresearchers.com/online-tools-for-researchers/.
Davis, M.J., Coppock, E. and Vowell, L., 2012. Science-Forums.net A Platform for Scientific Sharing and Collaboration. Grey Journal (TGJ), 8(1), pp.5–13.
Dostup za koshty biudzhetu do Scopus ta WoS dlia vyshiv ta naukovykh ustanov Ukrainy bude prodovzheno – nakaz MON, 2020. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/ynyca4dn.
Hayashi, K., 2021. How Could COVID-19 Change Scholarly Communication to a New Normal in the Open Science Paradigm? Patterns, 2(1), p.100191. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100191
Higgs, A., 2018. The new dimension in scholarly communications: How a global scholarly community collaboration created the world’s largest linked research knowledge system. Information Services & Use, 38(1-2), pp.85–89. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-180002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-180002
Horbenko, Y.O., 2009. Tendentsii rozvytku naukovykh komunikatsii v suchasnii Ukraini. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. V.N. Karazina, (881), pp.167–174. Available from: http://dspace.univer.kharkov.ua/handle/123456789/4853.
Hurd, J.M., 2000. The Transformation of Scientific Communication: A Model for 2020. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), pp.1279–1283. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1044>3.0.CO;2-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1044>3.0.CO;2-1
Kramer, B. and Bosman, J., 2015. 101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication - the Changing Research Workflow. Available from: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1286826.v1.
Kruesi, L.M., Tanner, K.J. and Burstein, F.V., 2018. Knowledge Management Theory and the Evidence-Based Healthcare Model to Guide the Design for an Australasia Open Biomedical Repository. IFLA WLIC 2018 – Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia – Transform Libraries, Transform Societies. Available from: http://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/2184.
Kuzminska, O., 2020. Theoretical and methodical principles of design and application of digital educational environment of scholarly communication of masters of research. The thesis for the degree of Doctor of Pedagogical Science, in specialty 13.00.10 – Information and Communication Technologies in Education. State Institution «Taras Shevchenko National University of Luhansk», Starobilsk. Available from: http://dspace.luguniv.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/6375.
Kuzminskaia, E.G., 2014. Informatcionnye tekhnologii i nauchnaia kommunikatciia: instrumenty i modeli vnedreniia v usloviiakh universiteta. Obrazovatelnye tekhnologii i obshchestvo, 17(1), pp.447–456. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/2p9f4ymp.
Levesque, R., 2005. SPSS Programming and Data Management: A Guide for SPSS and SAS Users. 2nd ed. SPSS Inc. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.370.2036&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Manca, S., 2018. ResearchGate and Academia.edu as networked socio-technical systems for scholarly communication: a literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2008
Mayer, K., 2015. From science 2.0 to open science – turning rhetoric into action? STCSN E-Letter, 3(1). Available from: http://stcsn.ieee.net/e-letter/stcsn-e-letter-vol-3-no-1/from-science-2-0-to-open-science.
Nicholas, D., Jamali, H.R., Herman, E., Watkinson, A., Abrizah, A., Rodríguez-Bravo, B., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Xu, J., Świgoń, M. and Polezhaeva, T., 2020. A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers. Learned Publishing, 33(3), pp.198–211. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1286
Riehle, C.F. and Hensley, M.K., 2017. What Do Undergraduate Students Know about Scholarly Communication?: A Mixed Methods Study. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 17(1), pp.145–178. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0009
Tammaro, A.M., 2017. Digital Scholarship Innovation and Digital Libraries: A Survey in Italy. In: M. Agosti, M. Bertini, S. Ferilli, S. Marinai and N. Orio, eds. Digital Libraries and Multimedia Archives. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.31–43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56300-8_4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56300-8_4
White, E. and King, L., 2020. Shaping scholarly communication guidance channels to meet the research needs and skills of doctoral students at Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(1), p.102081. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102081
Yaroshenko, T. Naukovi komunikatsii XXI stolittia: elektronni resursy dlia nauky ta osvity Ukrainy [Scientific communications of the 21 century: electronic resources for Ukrainian science and education]. Available from: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/938.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Olena H. Kuzminska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Accepted 2021-08-15
Published 2021-09-01