GenAI as scholarly ally: patterns, pedagogy, and policies in graduate writing research

Vita A. Hamaniuk; Serhiy O. Semerikov; Yaroslav V. Shramko

doi:10.55056/etq.965

Authors

Vita A. Hamaniuk Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3522-7673
Serhiy O. Semerikov Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0789-0272
Yaroslav V. Shramko Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4843-0328

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.965

Keywords:

generative artificial intelligence, graduate education, academic writing, meta-analysis, educational technology

Abstract

The integration of generative artificial intelligence into graduate-level academic writing has accelerated since 2019, yet systematic evidence regarding adoption patterns remains scattered. This study synthesises findings from 71 empirical studies identified through Scopus AI analysis, examining how Master's and PhD students employ these technologies across disciplines. Meta-analytic results indicate that students who engage in recursive interaction with AI tools achieve stronger writing outcomes (Hedges' g = 0.89, 95% CI [0.78, 1.00]) than those who use AI tools merely as editorial assistants (g = 0.41, 95% CI [0.29, 0.53]). Writing interventions that combine self-regulated learning strategies with AI support yield the largest effects (g = 0.94). Adoption rates vary by field: 78% in STEM, 71% in social sciences, and 62% in humanities, with distinct usage patterns emerging within each discipline. Analysis of institutional policies reveals that frameworks permitting structured AI use while requiring disclosure correlate with lower rates of academic misconduct (r = -0.62) compared to prohibitive approaches. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of AI in academic writing depends less on the technology itself than on the pedagogical context and strategic frameworks within which it operates. The evidence points toward a need for discipline-specific guidelines that acknowledge both the affordances and limitations of current AI capabilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract views: 199 / PDF views: 50

References

Adnin, R., Pandkar, A., Yao, B., Wang, D. and Das, M., 2025. Examining Student and Teacher Perspectives on Undisclosed Use of Generative AI in Academic Work. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, CHI ’25, p.1071. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713393

Akiba, D. and Garte, R., 2024. Leveraging AI Tools in University Writing Instruction: Enhancing Student Success While Upholding Academic Integrity. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 35(4), pp.467–480. Available from: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1676&context=qc_pubs. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70725/355152wkijve

Alcruz, J. and Schroeder, M.K., 2025. Integrating Generative AI into writing instruction: A cognitive apprenticeship approach to navigating technology and pedagogy. Theory into Practice. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2025.2528542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2025.2528542

Alvarez, G. and Cress, U., 2024. The uses of digital technologies in dissertation writing: Perspectives of Argentine graduate students in social sciences and humanities. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 7(2), pp.118–128. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.2.16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.2.16

Amini, M., Lee, K.F., Yiqiu, W. and Ravindran, L., 2025. Proposing a framework for ethical use of AI in academic writing based on a conceptual review: implications for quality education. Interactive Learning Environments. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2523382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2523382

Anani, G.E., Nyamekye, E. and Bafour-Koduah, D., 2025. Using artificial intelligence for academic writing in higher education: the perspectives of university students in Ghana. Discover Education, 4(1), p.46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00434-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00434-5

Arpaci, I., Al-Emran, M., Al-Qaysi, N. and Al-Sharafi, M.A., 2025. What Drives the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence to Promote Educational Sustainability? Evidence from SEM-ANN Approach. TechTrends. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01089-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01089-7

Arroyo-Machado, W., Ma, J., Chen, T., Johnson, T.P., Islam, S., Michalegko, L. and Welch, E., 2025. Generative AI and academic scientists in US universities: Perception, experience, and adoption intentions. PLOS ONE, 20(8), p.e0330416. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330416

Barrett, A. and Pack, A., 2023. Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), p.59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0

Bjelobaba, S., Waddington, L., Perkins, M., Foltýnek, T., Bhattacharyya, S. and Weber-Wulff, D., 2025. Maintaining research integrity in the age of GenAI: an analysis of ethical challenges and recommendations to researchers. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 21(1), p.18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-025-00191-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-025-00191-w

Blommerde, T., Charalambous, E., Bright, W., Musgrave, E., Ueno, L. and Magee, T., 2024. Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence into Teaching and Assessment: A Case Study from a University in the UK. In: X. O’Dea and D.T.K. Ng, eds. Effective Practices in AI Literacy Education: Case Studies and Reflections. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp.119–126. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83608-852-320241013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83608-852-320241013

Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2012. Thematic analysis. In: H. Cooper, P.M. Camic, D.L. Long, A.T. Panter, D. Rindskopf and K.J. Sher, eds. APA handbook of research methods inpsychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, vol. 2; Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, pp.57–71. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269930410.

Bu, Y.Q., Cao, Y.F., Chang, Z.Y., Chen, H.Y., Chen, X.W., Chen, Y.Y., Chen, Z.C., Deng, R., Ding, J., Fan, Z.K., Gao, G.Q., Gao, X., Hu, L., Hu, X.Q., Jia, H.T., Kong, Y., Li, E.M., Li, L., Li, Y.H., Liu, J.R., Liu, Z.Q., Luo, Y.P., Lv, X.M., Pei, Y.X., Peng, X.Z., Tang, Q.Q., Wan, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, M.X., Wang, X., Xie, G.K., Xie, J., Yan, X.H., Yin, M., Yu, Z.S., Zhou, C.Y. and Zhu, R.F., 2025. Expert Consensus on the Ethical Requirements for Generative AI-Assisted Academic Writing. Chinese Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 41(6), pp.826–832. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13865/j.cnki.cjbmb.2025.06.1272.

Campos, M., 2025. AI-assisted feedback in CLIL courses as a self-regulated language learning mechanism: students’ perceptions and experiences [Retroalimentación asistida por IA en cursos CLIL como mecanismo de aprendizaje autorregulado de idiomas: percepciones y experiencias de estudiantes]. European Public and Social Innovation Review, 10, pp.1–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1568

Chan, S., Lo, N. and Wong, A., 2024. Generative AI and Essay Writing: Impacts of Automated Feedback on Revision Performance and Engagement. rEFLections, 31(3), pp.1249–1284. Available from: https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v31i3.277514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v31i3.277514

Cherner, T., Foulger, T.S. and Donnelly, M., 2025. Introducing a Generative AI Decision Tree for Higher Education: A Synthesis of Ethical Considerations from Published Frameworks & Guidelines. TechTrends, 69(1), pp.84–99. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-01023-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-01023-3

Chung, H.H., Chung, F.L., Lin, S.M. and Lan, Y.J., 2023. Tools and Approaches of Generative Artificial Intelligence Used in Education. In: J.L. Shih et al., eds. 31st International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2023 - Proceedings. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, vol. 2, pp.17–26. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377748746.

Clarke, S., 2025. Exploring the landscape of GenAI and education literature: A taxonomy of themes and sub-themes. British Educational Research Journal. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4186

David, N.V., 2025. Ethical Considerations for Generative Artificial Intelligence-Driven Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. In: M. Sanmugam, Z.N. Khlaif, W.A.J. Wan Yahaya and Z. Abdullah, eds. A Practical Guide to Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Innovation and Applications. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, Advances in Science, Technology and Innovation, vol. Part F623, pp.119–128. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56848-0_13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56848-0_13

Derić, E., Frank, D. and Malenica, M., 2024. Comparison and Quantification of GAI Tools Use Among Different Academic Population Segments. 2024 47th ICT and Electronics Convention, MIPRO 2024 - Proceedings. pp.730–735. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPRO60963.2024.10569253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPRO60963.2024.10569253

Deroncele-Acosta, A., Sayán-Rivera, R.M.E., Mendoza-López, A.D. and Norabuena-Figueroa, E.D., 2025. Generative Artificial Intelligence and Transversal Competencies in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Applied System Innovation, 8(3), p.83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/asi8030083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/asi8030083

Eltaybani, S., Ali, H.F.M. and Abdelhalim, G.E., 2025. Exploring nurse educators’ and students’ use of large language models for academic purposes in a developing country: Unethical uses reported. Nurse Education in Practice, 87, p.104502. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104502

Erle, L., Hoss, T., Peltzer, I. and Eimler, S.C., 2025. Opportunities and Challenges of Generative AI in Education Through the Eyes of Students and Educators: A Qualitative Interview Approach. In: A.I. Cristea, E. Walker, Y. Lu, O.C. Santos and S. Isotani, eds. Artificial Intelligence in Education. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 15882, pp.316–323. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98465-5_40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98465-5_40

Fernandez, J. and Guilbert, J., 2024. Self-regulated strategy development’s effectiveness: underlying cognitive and metacognitive mechanisms. Metacognition and Learning, 19(3), pp.1091–1135. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09398-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09398-7

Frank, D., Bernik, A. and Milkovic, M., 2024. Efficient Generative AI-Assisted Academic Research: Considerations for a Research Model Proposal. ICCC 2024 - IEEE 11th International Conference on Computational Cybernetics and Cyber-Medical Systems, Proceedings. pp.25–30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCC62278.2024.10583155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCC62278.2024.10583155

Furze, L., Perkins, M., Roe, J. and MacVaugh, J., 2024. The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) in action: A pilot implementation of GenAI-supported assessment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), pp.38–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9434

Gabriel, S., 2024. Generative AI in Writing Workshops: A Path to AI Literacy. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on AI Research, ICAIR 2024. pp.126–132. Available from: https://doi.org/10.34190/icair.4.1.3022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/icair.4.1.3022

Guillén-Yparrea, N. and Hernández-Rodríguez, F., 2024. Unveiling Generative AI in Higher Education: Insights from Engineering Students and Professors. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON. pp.1–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON60312.2024.10578876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON60312.2024.10578876

Henke, J., 2025. The new normal: the increasing adoption of generative AI in university communication. Journal of Science Communication, 24(2), pp.1–27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.24020207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.24020207

Hidalgo, C. and Halim, N.L., 2025. Generative AI in K-12 Education Policy: A Preliminary Global Review. In: A.I. Cristea, E. Walker, Y. Lu, O.C. Santos and S. Isotani, eds. Artificial Intelligence in Education. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 15881, pp.100–107. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98462-4_13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98462-4_13

Irish, A.L., Gazica, M.W. and Becerra, V., 2025. A qualitative descriptive analysis on generative artificial intelligence: bridging the gap in pedagogy to prepare students for the workplace. Discover Education, 4(1), p.48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00435-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00435-4

Jayatilake, T., 2025. Designing an Ethical Framework for the Integration of Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Stakeholder Interests and Enhancing Learning Outcomes. In: A.I. Cristea, E. Walker, Y. Lu, O.C. Santos and S. Isotani, eds. Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium, Blue Sky, and WideAIED. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 2590, pp.334–339. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99261-2_33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99261-2_33

Juliet, H. and Antony, C., 2014. The five resources of critical digital literacy: a framework for curriculum integration. Research in Learning Technology, 21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21.21334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21.21334

Khamis, N., Chen, B., Egan, C., Gaglani, S. and Tackett, S., 2025. More intelligent faculty development: Integrating GenAI in curriculum development programs. Medical Teacher. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2473606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2473606

Kim, J., Lee, S.S., Detrick, R., Wang, J. and Li, N., 2025. Students-Generative AI interaction patterns and its impact on academic writing. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09444-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09444-6

Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R. and Li, N., 2025. Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), pp.1265–1300. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7

Korchak, A., Fanguy, M., Adamovich, K., Zhang, H., Baldwin, M. and Costley, J., 2025. Enhancing Collaborative Academic Writing with Generative Artificial Intelligence: Use and Effects. In: A.I. Cristea, E. Walker, Y. Lu, O.C. Santos and S. Isotani, eds. Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium, Blue Sky, and WideAIED. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 2591, pp.297–304. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99264-3_37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99264-3_37

Lahby, M., Maleh, Y., Bucchiarone, A. and Schaeffer, S.E., eds, 2024. General Aspects of Applying Generative AI in Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges. Cham: Springer. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65691-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65691-0

Lo, N., Wong, A. and Chan, S., 2025. The impact of generative AI on essay revisions and student engagement. Computers and Education Open, 9, p.100249. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100249

Losinski, M., Cuenca-Carlino, Y., Zablocki, M. and Teagarden, J., 2014. Examining the efficacy of self-regulated strategy development for students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A meta-analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), pp.52–67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.52

Mendonca, J.M.P., Babo, L., Pinto, C.M.A., Cruz, M., Queiros, R. and Mascarenhas, D., 2025. Work in Progress: Exploring Educators’ Perceptions on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. EDUNINE 2025 - 9th IEEE Engineering Education World Conference: Education in the Age of Generative AI: Embracing Digital Transformation - Proceedings. pp.1–4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE62377.2025.10981419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE62377.2025.10981419

Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Cai, Y., Collier, T., Tahamtan, I. and Eftekhar, A., 2026. Is generative AI reshaping academic practices worldwide? A survey of adoption, benefits, and concerns. Information Processing and Management, 63(1), p.104350. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104350

Moorhouse, B.L., Wan, Y., Wu, C., Wu, M. and Ho, T.Y., 2025. Generative AI tools and empowerment in L2 academic writing. System, 133, p.103779. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103779

Mphahlele, A. and McKenna, S., 2019. The use of turnitin in the higher education sector: Decoding the myth. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), pp.1079–1089. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1573971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1573971

Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B. and Huang, X., 2024. Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), pp.847–864. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593

OpenAI, 2022. Introducing ChatGPT. Available from: https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/.

Oubibi, M., 2025. Generative artificial intelligence: postgraduate student’s digital adaptability, engagement and academic confidence. Journal of Computers in Education. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-025-00364-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-025-00364-z

Panday-Shukla, P., 2025. Exploring generative artificial intelligence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 165, p.105088. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105088

Pangrazio, L., 2016. Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), pp.163–174. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.942836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.942836

Parker, J.L., Richard, V.M., Acabá, A., Escoffier, S., Flaherty, S., Jablonka, S. and Becker, K.P., 2024. Negotiating Meaning with Machines: AI’s Role in Doctoral Writing Pedagogy. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00425-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4793715

Pinho, I., Costa, A.P. and Pinho, C., 2025. Generative AI Governance Model in Educational Research. Frontiers in Education, 10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1594343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1594343

Pit, P., Linden, T. and Mendoza, A., 2024. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: One Year Later. 30th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2024. p.11. Available from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2024/is_education/is_education/11/.

Rafi, M.S. and Amjad, I., 2025. The role of generative AI in writing doctoral dissertation: perceived opportunities, challenges, and facilitating strategies to promote human agency. Discover Education, 4(1), p.165. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00503-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00503-9

Rakedzon, T., Tsabari, A.B., Segev, E. and Yosef, R., 2024. Extended Abstract: The Impact of Interactive AI Feedback on STEM Students’ Writing of Lay Research Summaries. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference. pp.294–295. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm61427.2024.00064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm61427.2024.00064

Rosário, P., Fuentes, S., Beuchat, M. and Ramaciotti, A., 2016. Self-regulated learning in a college classroom: A curriculum infusion approach [Autorregulación del aprendizaje en una clase de la universidad: Un enfoque de infusión curricular]. Revista de Investigacion Educativa, 34(1), pp.31–49. Available from: https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.34.1.229421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.34.1.229421

Salman, H.A., Ahmad, M.A., Ibrahim, R. and Mahmood, J., 2025. Systematic analysis of generative AI tools integration in academic research and peer review. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(1), p.e202502. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15832

Shafiee Rad, H., 2025. Reinforcing L2 reading comprehension through artificial intelligence intervention: refining engagement to foster self-regulated learning. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1), p.23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00377-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00377-2

Singh, J.P., Mishra, N. and Singla, B., 2025. From Ideation to Publication: Ethical Practices for Using Generative AI in Academic Research. In: B. Singla, K. Shalender and N. Singh, eds. Navigating Data Science: Unleashing the Creative Potential of Artificial Intelligence. Emerald Publishing Limited, chap. 7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83608-298-920251007.

Sperber, L., MacArthur, M., Minnillo, S., Stillman, N. and Whithaus, C., 2025. Peer and AI Review + Reflection (PAIRR): A human-centered approach to formative assessment. Computers and Composition, 76, p.102921. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102921

Sun, T., Wang, C. and Wang, Y., 2022. The effectiveness of self-regulated strategy development on improving English writing: Evidence from the last decade. Reading and Writing, 35(10), pp.2497–2522. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10297-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10297-z

Taiye, M., High, C., Velander, J., Matar, K., Okmanis, R. and Milrad, M., 2024. Generative AI-Enhanced Academic Writing: A Stakeholder-Centric Approach for the Design and Development of CHAT4ISP-AI. Proceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, SAC ’24, p.74–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/3605098.3636055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3605098.3636055

Tan, M.X.Y., Qu, Y. and Wang, J., 2025. Student Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence Regulations: A Mixed-Methods Study of Higher Education in Singapore. Higher Education Quarterly, 79(3), p.e70038. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70038

Tantivejakul, N., Chantharasombat, J. and Kongpolphrom, W., 2024. Voices of the Future: Exploring Students’ Views on the Use of GenAI in Academic and Professional PR Writing. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(2), pp.511–537. Available from: https://doi.org/10.70730/PVTD8302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70730/PVTD8302

Teng, L.S., 2022. Investigating the Effectiveness of Self-Regulation Strategy Intervention. English Language Education, 26, pp.151–181. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99520-1_7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99520-1_7

Teng, L.S. and Zhang, L.J., 2020. Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom: Can self-regulated learning strategies-based writing instruction make a difference? Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, p.100701. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100701

Ullah, M., Bin Naeem, S. and Kamel Boulos, M.N., 2024. Assessing the Guidelines on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Universities: A Survey of the World’s Top 50 Universities. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 8(12), p.194. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8120194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8120194

Usher, M. and Amzalag, M., 2025. From Prompt to Polished: Exploring Student–Chatbot Interactions for Academic Writing Assistance. Education Sciences, 15(3), p.329. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030329

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D., 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), pp.425–478. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Verma, S., Kashive, N. and Gupta, A., 2025. Examining predictors of generative-AI acceptance and usage in academic research: a sequential mixed-methods approach. Benchmarking. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2024-0564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2024-0564

Wang, L. and Ren, B., 2024. Enhancing Academic Writing in a Linguistics Course with Generative AI: An Empirical Study in a Higher Education Institution in Hong Kong. Education Sciences, 14(12), p.1329. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121329

Wu, T. and Zhang, S.h., 2024. Applications and Implication of Generative AI in Non-STEM Disciplines in Higher Education. In: F. Zhao and D. Miao, eds. AI-generated Content. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 1946, pp.341–349. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7587-7_29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7587-7_29

Yoo, J.H., 2025. Defining the Boundaries of AI Use in Scientific Writing: A Comparative Review of Editorial Policies. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 40(23), p.e187. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e187

Zhang, J. and Sun, D., 2025. A Systematic Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2025 7th International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education, CSTE 2025. pp.552–556. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/CSTE64638.2025.11092288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CSTE64638.2025.11092288

Zhang, Z., Aubrey, S., Huang, X. and Chiu, T.K.F., 2025. The role of generative AI and hybrid feedback in improving L2 writing skills: a comparative study. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2025.2503890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2025.2503890

Zhu, M., 2025. Leveraging ChatGPT to Support Self-Regulated Learning in Online Courses. TechTrends. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01075-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01075-z

Zimmerman, B.J., 2000. Chapter 2 - Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. In: M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich and M. Zeidner, eds. Handbook of Self-Regulation. San Diego: Academic Press, pp.13–39. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7

Zlotnikova, I., Hlomani, H., Mokgetse, T. and Bagai, K., 2025. Establishing ethical standards for GenAI in university education: a roadmap for academic integrity and fairness. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 23(2), pp.188–216. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-07-2024-0104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-07-2024-0104